Search for: "Daniels v. State" Results 401 - 420 of 5,561
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Feb 2023, 2:48 pm by John Floyd
”   The CCA answered this question in the negative on February 15, 2023, in Edwards v. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 4:39 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Gorsuch’s opinion says the Lanham Act exercises considerable care in mens rea, which is then picked up by Jack Daniels; redefining section 43 remedies. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 7:07 am by Eleonora Rosati
Standard International Management v EUIPO Case T-768/20 EU General Court (July 2022)Can a hotel in the United States use an EU trade mark? [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 1:07 pm by Dennis Crouch
As a point of context, it’s worth noting that many states already require disclosure or much more draconian regulation of litigation funders backing state court cases—for instance, some states require funds and funders to register, and some even require funding agreements to be disclosed with the state. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 5:13 am by Emma Snell
Daniels ruled that federal courts lacked legal jurisdiction to seize the funds. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 9:16 am by Daniel Gilman
Given the Supreme Court’s recent articulation of the major questions doctrine in West Virginia v. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 6:47 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
(See Central Park Gardens, Inc. v Klein, 107 Misc 2d 414, 415 [Civ Ct, NY County 1980] [holding that CCA § 110 confers on Housing Court “the power to issue injunctions and restraining orders for the enforcement of housing standards promulgated under State and local laws”].) [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 5:01 am by Amichai Cohen, Yuval Shany
The latter role has no analogue in the United States, where the Supreme Court has original jurisdiction only over the smallest range of matters and serves almost exclusively as an appellate body. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:55 am by The Petrie-Flom Center Staff
We are not imagining what obstacles lie ahead if we were to “codify Roe v. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:44 am by admin
  To be sure, there are gaps, inconsistencies, and mistakes, but the statistics chapter should be a must-read for federal (and state) judges. [read post]