Search for: "David M Anderson" Results 401 - 420 of 503
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Dec 2008, 12:52 am
"It's a sign of the evolving moral standards in the country," said David Hogg, a Dothan defense attorney. [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 5:11 pm by Max Kennerly, Esq.
I’m sure there are arguments to be made there for Chevron: look closely enough at any legal issue and, much like in quantum mechanics, the lines become blurry. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 6:25 am by Mandelman
At the end of 2010, the California State Bar Association reported that it was investigating 2,000 complaints of loan modification fraud, and Suzan Anderson, who is Supervisor of the State Bar’s Special Team on Loan Modification Fraud, speaking last December to David Streitfeld of The New York Times said: “I wish the law had worked. [read post]
17 May 2011, 5:42 am by Mandelman
 (Kidding, Max, I’m just kidding… you know I kid… I’m a kidder.) [read post]
30 Oct 2016, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
Belize Three government officials have to pay defamation damages of $5,000 to Chief Pharmacist, Sharon Anderson after comments they made about her. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
Huntsman had Vinson & Elkins partners David Harvin and Harry Reasoner. [read post]
11 May 2015, 11:00 am by Sebastian Brady
On MSNBC yesterday, he said, “I’m tired of extending a bad law. [read post]
28 Mar 2021, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
Information Design for Differential Privacy, Ian M. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 10:01 pm
  Michigan: Domestic Diversions by David C. [read post]
Anderson on developments in foreign relations and international law, Stephanie Pell on cyber issues, Alan Rozenshtein on social media and content moderation, Daniel Byman and J. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 10:37 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  I learned a lot, and I’m going to recount some of the highlights. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 9:06 pm by Cody M. Poplin
The event will be moderated by David Perera. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 12:12 pm by Ben Berwick, Justin Florence
” So if Congress had tasked the president, just as the earlier King had tasked the Earl of M., with executing a task—say, providing military aid to an ally—but the president refused to do that until he had received something of personal value in return, the precedent at the time of the Founding would have been impeachment. [read post]