Search for: "Davidson v. State"
Results 401 - 420
of 540
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Nov 2013, 1:14 pm
Thus, a timely protest is an essential prerequisite for relief under a CPL 330.30 (1) claim of an error of law, unless the error has deprived the defendant of a fundamental right akin to People v Davidson, People v Padro and People v Antommarchi. [read post]
29 May 2009, 3:19 am
March 31, 2009 Argument Transcript hereSCOTUS docket hereSCOTUSwiki hereRicci v. [read post]
18 Feb 2025, 9:01 pm
The landmark SFFA v. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 7:45 am
The North Carolina Cerebral Palsy Resource Guide contains resources for those with cerebral palsy within the State of North Carolina. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 1:52 pm
In Ponzetto v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 4:59 pm
This may be why police departments supported the pro-Miranda side of Dickerson v. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 8:05 am
" [18] V. [read post]
29 May 2023, 9:03 am
The ICO released a statement in response, stating that it does not share the views of the report. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 10:16 am
Harley Davidson Co., 2010 WL 2723079 (M.D. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 12:01 pm
Metro Gov't of Nashville & Davidson County, No. 06-1595Title VII/retaliation* October 8, 2008 Argument Transcript here* SCOTUSWIKI here* LIIBULLETIN here14 Penn Plaza LLC v. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 2:36 pm
Supreme Court, June 02, 2008 US v. [read post]
13 May 2020, 3:26 pm
G.S. 15A-1344(f)(3); State v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 3:47 am
Last week, in State v. [read post]
17 Feb 2020, 7:23 am
In Acree v. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 4:30 am
The United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia, Athens Division, touched on this issue in a decision last week.In Morris v. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 1:20 am
For example, the 11th Circuit in United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 8:45 am
With regard to Hamilton Uptown, LLC v. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 2:51 pm
SCOTUS has not decided this question, preferring to resolve the issue on statutory grounds in Department of Commerce v House of Representatives, 525 U.S. 316 (1999). [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 1:09 pm
You betcha.In state after state, whether product liability is common-law or statutory, and whether it’s based on the Second or Third Restatement, courts have refused to allow plaintiffs to make claims asserting that legal products should not have been sold at all. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 3:47 pm
Schlumberger Technology Corporation v. [read post]
