Search for: "Davis v. Superior Court"
Results 401 - 420
of 458
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Aug 2009, 9:51 pm
In arguing their motion, Microsoft unfortunately relied on Schering Corp v Pfizer (1999) where, although the Court had excluded five surveys from evidence under the hearsay rule, the Court did not discuss Rule 703 save to say, damagingly for Microsoft, that it was an acceptable basis to admit survey evidence. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 9:00 pm
Although Davis implied, id. at 230 n.24, that the two Teague exceptions to this rule quoted above will apply to collateral attacks on criminal convictions in Superior Court, we need not consider that point further because appellant has not argued - and cannot fairly argue - that either exception is met by the rule of Crawford and its progeny, as the court made clear in Whorton. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
Superior Court, 920 P.2d 1347, 1350-51 (Cal. 1996); Brown v. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 9:26 am
And the "book" that she's allegedly planning to write will probably look a little like this.So I don't think the world's missing much as a result of Justice Davis' ruling that she doesn't get a looksie.P.S. - I didn't realize it when I originally wrote this, but apparently this is not Ms. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 9:45 am
Upon its own review, the Supreme Court agreed:The doctrine of respondeat superior rests upon the relation of master and servant. [read post]
1 Feb 2009, 6:39 pm
Braman v. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
Specifically as to inadequate warning claims the court in Anderson v. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 12:01 pm
December 19, 2008)Dismissing Petition for review of FAA order denying exemption from Pilot Age 60 RuleCAFC* Davis v. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 2:57 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, December 17, 2008 US v. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 10:36 pm
Superior Court, 270 Cal. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 11:50 am
Superior Court, 920 P.2d 1347, 1351 n.2 (Cal. 1996); Brown v. [read post]
4 Oct 2008, 9:00 am
PUBLISHED OPINIONS OpinionShort Title/District 08a0353p.062008/09/29 Davis v. [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 5:43 pm
Michael Ray ("Ray") appeals from the Allen Superior Court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Laidlaw Medical Transportation, Inc. d/b/a American Medical Response of Fort Wayne ("AMR") in Ray's "whistleblower" suit against AMR. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 7:30 pm
County Supreme Court issued a ruling on September 10 in Taylor v. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 9:32 pm
And the governor, under his interpretation of federal labor law and the state Supreme Court's decision in White v. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 5:40 am
Here is the abstract:This essay seeks to explain the Davis v. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 8:40 pm
The State - Homeless Sex Offender ChallengeBelow this message are a couple articles about the case that was argued in the Georgia Supreme Court this past Monday, Santos V. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 7:18 pm
So, legally, I totally understand why the Court of Appeal has to resolve the case. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 2:36 pm
Supreme Court, June 02, 2008 US v. [read post]
30 May 2008, 2:44 pm
The Insurer was successful in obtaining a declaration to this effect in the Superior Court. [read post]
