Search for: "Day v. Genuine Parts Company"
Results 401 - 420
of 549
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Aug 2012, 1:21 am
In an August 21, 2012 opinion (here), Judge James V. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 1:44 pm
See, e.g., Reed v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 11:31 am
Rearden LLC v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 4:17 am
In Riegel v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 5:30 am
Chevron Corp. v. [read post]
6 May 2012, 2:29 pm
The Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 ObiterJ posted a far-reaching analysis of this new Act on his blog this week (Part 2 is here), considering it a “radical rethink” aimed to save the government some £350 million on legal aid. [read post]
1 May 2012, 12:58 pm
The corporation's failure to give 60-days notice before issuing the dividend did not make it impossible for plaintiffs to comply with the trustee demand exception.Akanthos Capital Management, LLC v. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 9:57 pm
” United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 6:38 am
The borrower may be genuine in his grievance against the Bank and he may simply want to fight for his rights against the Bank.It is an allegation that the Debt Recovery Tribunals do favour the Banks and do not even listen to the borrowers even when there is a good case for the borrowers. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:01 pm
Therefore where a transaction is sham and not genuine as in the present case then it cannot be considered to be a part of tax planning or legitimate avoidance of tax liability. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 7:29 am
Ultimately, EEOC v. [read post]
25 Feb 2012, 3:45 am
According to Companies House, Esto was incorporated on 10 October 2011. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm
But there was no Swiss company “Crown Cork & Seal CO” registered at the address indicated in the notice of appeal, which was the correct address of the “Crown Cork AG” company. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 5:46 pm
In Beye v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 2:30 am
On Tuesday 31 January 2012, Tugendhat J heard the adjournedCMC in Kim & anr v Tong & ors (part heard from 7 October 2011) and gave ex tempore rulings. [read post]
Review of the Effects of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act on Third Party Participation Applicants
1 Feb 2012, 9:15 am
And there is always the problem of how to file a derivation proceeding for national stage applications; an applicant will not generally know within 1 year of publication that the national stage has been filed, since PCT applications need not enter the national stage until the 30th month.[4] Since the 18 month PCT publication qualifies as a U.S. patent publication,[5] this 30th month entry literally leaves a day to file a derivation. [read post]
14 Jan 2012, 12:09 pm
In Beye v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 4:02 pm
Representing broadcasting companies will be Carter G. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 4:11 pm
He does this in part with vague references and in part my altering my emails to him to change their content. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 9:56 am
Supreme Court decision in Stern v. [read post]
