Search for: "Deal, et al v. Grant, et al" Results 401 - 420 of 994
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Apr 2010, 4:30 am
Sandoz Pharmaceuticals GmbH et al (EPLAW) Prilosec (Omeprazole) – US: AstraZeneca ordered to pay attorney’s fees for ‘baseless’ suit to protect Prilosec OTC: AstraZeneca AB et al. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 8:19 am
Soured deals struck with wealthy clients are haunting Citigroup Chief Executive Officer Vikram Pandit. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
The issues in that case centred on the lawfulness and effect of those provisions and their compatibility with, amongst others, Article 6 of the Convention, whereas in Al Rawi v Home Office the Court was concerned with the position at common law. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 5:24 am
(IP Think Tank) New force in Europe – EPLAW Patent Blog (IP Think Tank) IP references left out of last-minute, weak global climate deal in Copenhagen (IP Watch) UN Climate Change Conference, Copenhagen – IP discussion (IPKat) (Spicy IP) (IP Watch) (IP Watch) (WIPO) Implementing the Development Agenda nationally: WIPO seminar (Jeremy de Beer) WIPO traditional knowledge meeting stalls, but begins to breach trust gap (IP Watch) Poverty in the developing world: Should TRIPs really… [read post]
18 Dec 2007, 12:05 pm
James and Dawn Dines, Town of Porter, Indiana, et al (NFP) - "The owners whose property abuts Glenwood Beach Trail certainly have a common interest in using it to gain access to their homes. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 6:27 pm by John Palley
-John 192 Cal.App.4th 90 (2011) MEGAN KUCKER et al., as Trustees, etc., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 6:27 pm by John Palley
-John 192 Cal.App.4th 90 (2011) MEGAN KUCKER et al., as Trustees, etc., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 2:36 pm
Consequently, it held that they did not constitute "same parties" within the meaning of Article 27 of Council Regulation 44/2001, as their interests could not be deemed identical nor indissociable (see Case C-351/96, Drouot v CMI Industrial Sites et Al.). [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 11:51 am by Marc-Andre Russell
Canada Bread Company Ltd. et al Supreme Court Docket: 34505 Date of leave granted: March 29, 2012 [read post]
23 Nov 2013, 7:24 pm by Lori Schweller
Dye et al., 259 Va. 282 (2000), the owners association for a townhouse community appealed a decision of the Fairfax Count Circuit Court in favor of the plaintiff unit owners. [read post]