Search for: "Deal v. USA" Results 401 - 420 of 1,303
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Sep 2017, 6:49 am by MOTP
" The Parkers further alleged that IB owed them, as trust beneficiaries, a duty of fair dealing, which it breached by violating certain FINRA rules.[2] Specifically, IB failed to use "reasonable diligence" in the opening and maintenance of their trust account; know the "essential facts" concerning the trust, as its customer; "have a reasonable basis to believe that a recommended transaction or investment strategy involving a security or securities [was]… [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 2:59 am by INFORRM
The Supreme Court of Canada has issued its decision in Google Inc v Equustek (2017 SCC 34). [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 4:00 am by John Gregory
United States The implications of such uses of technology in the USA have been noted with concern here, here and here. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 3:47 am by Ben
And in Access Copyright v. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 6:46 am by Graham Smith
The Supreme Court of Canada has issued its decision in Google Inc v Equustek (28 June 2017). [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 6:46 am by Graham Smith
The Supreme Court of Canada has issued its decision in Google Inc v Equustek (28 June 2017). [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
” At Jost on Justice, Ken Jost weighs in on Packingham v. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 4:24 am by SHG
Not that the forces of tolerance will bother to learn anything more about the case of Masterpeice Cake Shop v. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 2:10 pm by Giles Peaker
Evidence from Professor Maggie Atkinson, who was Children’s Commissioner for England between 2010 and 2015, deals with the UNCRC, which has been ratified by all nations save the USA. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 12:00 pm by Sheppard Mullin
 Although the existence of the deal was made public (through a required SEC filing), the specific formulation details were redacted. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 12:00 pm by Daniel Taskalis
 Although the existence of the deal was made public (through a required SEC filing), the specific formulation details were redacted. [read post]