Search for: "Dean v. United States" Results 401 - 420 of 1,457
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Mar 2024, 9:31 pm by Justin Hendrix
” Here is the email exchange: For more on this, we recommend reading Dean Jackson, “First Amendment Defenders and the Supreme Court Should Reject the Jawboning Bogeyman,” Tech Policy Press, Feb. 22, 2024. 4. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 11:38 am by Erwin Chemerinsky
One important Kennedy opinion pointing in the other direction was United States v. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 6:31 am by Beth Graham
The United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit has held that a Texas attorney may not engage in class arbitration against the parent company of the legal research system LexisNexis. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 7:48 am by Adam Schlossman
   Most of my arguments have been in courts of appeals, only a handful in the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 6:23 am by Ted Folkman
As a lawyer, she was probably best known for arguing United Church of Christ v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 6:00 am by Steve Vladeck
And we should hear soon from the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, which heard argument in April in United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm by John Dean
Nixon and Kissinger negotiated the Paris Peace Accords and ended the Vietnam War for the United States in January 1973. [read post]
3 Oct 2021, 10:20 am by Emily Dai
United States when reading laws about computers. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 8:08 am by Kiera Flynn
  The United States recently filed a petition for certioriari in United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 11:09 pm by Shelton Abramson
Pat Toomey (R-PA) recently introduced a bill in the United States Senate that would establish a federal breach notification requirement for certain companies and preempt state breach notification laws that are currently in effect for 46 states. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm by John Dean
United States (1971) and United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 9:16 am by Gritsforbreakfast
In each of the five most recent cases, the United States Supreme Court majority has been at pains to emphasize that "well before our decision in Penry I, our cases had firmly established that sentencing juries must be able to give meaningful consideration and effect to all mitigating evidence that might provide a basis for refusing to impose the death penalty[.] [read post]