Search for: "Deas v. Deas"
Results 401 - 420
of 822
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
A Sniff Is A Search By Any Other Name, But Is It Reliable? Florida v. Jardines and Florida v. Harris
31 Mar 2013, 7:51 am
Jardines In Florida v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 8:09 am
And this actually should make sense in connection with Roe v. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 10:40 am
Calhoun v. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 2:10 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 11:06 am
McGaughey v. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 9:03 am
The policy regarding surveillance of marijuana grow operations in open or public fields has been governed by the decision in U.S. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 12:41 pm
Petitioners challenged the DEA’s denial of its petition to initiate proceedings to reschedule marijuana as a Schedule III, IV, or V drug. [read post]
D.C. Circuit Rules DEA's Denial of Petition to Reschedule Marijuana Was Not Arbitrary and Capricious
25 Jan 2013, 12:00 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, in Americans for Safe Access v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
” The DEA’s regulations, which we approved in Alliance for Cannabis Therapeutics v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
” The DEA’s regulations, which we approved in Alliance for Cannabis Therapeutics v. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 7:41 pm
In a federal case I testified in recently (US v Simmons), the defendant's compliance with the Oregon Medical Marijuana Act was material in the case because in the application for search warrant, the DEA agent referenced the Ogden & Cole memos (which describe the U.S. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 4:08 pm
Benfer, Christine Nero Coughlin, Dea C. [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 8:41 pm
At least since the Supreme Court's 2005 decision in Gonzales v. [read post]
15 Nov 2012, 5:40 am
See Thompson v. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 7:07 am
The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) enforces the federal controlled substances laws and regulations. [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 9:00 am
The judge’s decision relied mostly on Supreme Court precedent from Oliver v. [read post]
5 Nov 2012, 10:06 am
U.S. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 8:00 am
Specifically, the amendments would: (i) limit the registrants that may provide DEA to fully registered dealers, and limit those that may use DEA to portfolio managers and restricted portfolio managers (thereby excluding exempt market dealers); (ii) require dealers to establish, maintain and apply appropriate standards for providing DEA and assess and document whether each client meets the standards; (iii) require that dealers… [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 10:49 am
EEOC v. [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 5:55 am
TweetVenkat Balasubramani at Technology & Marketing Law Blog has a good analysis of U.S. v. [read post]
