Search for: "Denis v. Perry"
Results 401 - 420
of 895
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2013, 8:03 am
Windsor and Hollingsworth v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 7:05 am
Perry - The Prop 8 Case First, let's look at Hollingsworth v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 5:19 am
Am I the only one who thinks all nine justices collectively wrote both opinions in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 6:23 pm
The case, United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 5:56 pm
They are-Hollingsworth v Perry (rejecting an appeal of the lower court decision overturning California's Proposition 8, on technical jurisdictional grounds), and US v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 4:35 pm
If that were not enough, the Supreme Court’s companion decision, Hollingsworth v Perry, No. 12-144, decided June 26, 2013, leaves in place a determination, under California state law, that same-sex partners could not be denied the benefits of marriage. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 4:32 pm
If that were not enough, the Supreme Court’s companion decision, Hollingsworth v Perry, No. 12-144, decided June 26, 2013, leaves in place a determination, under California state law, that same-sex partners could not be denied the benefits of marriage. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 2:40 pm
For example, In Skinner v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 2:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 12:35 pm
If that were not enough, the Supreme Court’s companion decision, Hollingsworth v Perry, No. 12-144, decided June 26, 2013, leaves in place a determination, under California state law, that same-sex partners could not be denied the benefits of marriage. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 12:32 pm
If that were not enough, the Supreme Court’s companion decision, Hollingsworth v Perry, No. 12-144, decided June 26, 2013, leaves in place a determination, under California state law, that same-sex partners could not be denied the benefits of marriage. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 8:52 am
UPDATE 7: Here's Hollingsworth v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 8:10 am
(Bush v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 7:34 am
Supreme Court Should Not Fear That Denying the Proposition 8 Sponsors Federal Standing Will Weaken The Initiative Device (And a Few Other Thoughts on the Oral Argument in Perry v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 12:00 am
Perry, has nothing to do with gay rights as a legal matter. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
And in Lawrence v. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 3:01 pm
The court may release its ruling on that case, Windsor v. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 4:56 am
In Perry it could hold that amending the state constitution to eliminate the right of same sex couples to marry violated equal protection, and in Windsor, it could hold that the application of DOMA to deny federal recognition to a same sex marriage that is valid under the law of the state where the parties reside violates 10th Amendment state sovereignty and/or equal protection. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 12:50 pm
Perry and United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 8:00 am
But on the 50-year anniversary of Gideon v. [read post]
