Search for: "District of Columbia v. Smith" Results 401 - 420 of 452
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Sep 2009, 7:52 am
[Akin Gump and Howe & Russell represent the petitioner] Opinion below (Supreme Court of Washington) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner's reply Brief amici curiae of Public Defender Service for the District of Columbia, et al. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
Skelos, a State Senator elected from the 9th Senatorial District, commenced this action for a declaratory judgment that the Governor's appointment of Mr. [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 2:07 pm
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 9:54 am
District courts in the Second , Third , Fifth and Seventh Circuits have ruled in favor of transgender plaintiffs, as has the Federal District Court for the District of Columbia . [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
Sterling Drug, Inc., 416 F.2d 417, 426 (2d Cir. 1969).District of Columbia: McNeil Pharmaceutical v. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 10:42 am
We've been keeping an eye on some interesting litigation in the District of Columbia, Iacangelo v. [read post]
20 Dec 2008, 3:00 am
(Class 46) Council Regulation 1229/2008 enters San Simón da Costa (PDO), Ail blanc de Lomagne (PGI), Steirischer Kren (PGI) into Register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Class 46) Court of First Instance, consolidating four appeals, annuls decisions of Board of Appeal and awards costs to Budvar in proceedings over BUD appellation: Budějovický Budvar, národní podnik v Office for Harmonisation in… [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 10:36 pm
District of ColumbiaInformal interviews are allowed in the District of Columbia. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 11:50 am
Upjohn Co., 778 A.2d 829, 836-37 (Conn. 2001).District of Columbia: Dyson v. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 8:56 pm
United States Issue: Whether a district court may direct a defendant to serve a federal sentence consecutively to a not-yet-imposed state sentence. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 5:52 am
The United States Courts of Appeals for the First Circuit and District of Columbia have acknowledged that hybrid-rights claims may warrant heightened scrutiny, but have suggested that a plaintiff must meet a stringent standard: the free exercise claim must be conjoined with an independently viable companion right. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 5:52 am
The United States Courts of Appeals for the First Circuit and District of Columbia have acknowledged that hybrid-rights claims may warrant heightened scrutiny, but have suggested that a plaintiff must meet a stringent standard: the free exercise claim must be conjoined with an independently viable companion right. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
– discussion of Washington Post article on Ismed’s efforts to promote follow-on biologics approval pathway: (Patent Baristas), (Patent Docs), US: Congressional fact-finding on follow-on biologics: (Patent Docs), US: David v Monsanto: Biotechnology patent ‘exhaustion’ after Quanta, Supreme Court petition: (Hal Wegner), US: Ulysses Pharmaceuticals announces issuance of patent for novel class of ant [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 12:49 pm
The District of Columbia does not recognize cross-jurisdictional class action tolling. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 2:16 am
Recently the Supreme Court of the United States handed down its decision in the case of District of Columbia v. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 4:59 pm
Introducing the Smith & Wesson commemorative Heller v. [read post]