Search for: "Division of Parole" Results 401 - 420 of 988
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Nov 2013, 2:34 pm
Pursuant to Correction Law § 168–g(1), the division of parole or department of probation and correctional alternatives in accordance with risk factors pursuant to section [168– l ] shall determine the duration of registration and notification for every sex offender who on the effective date of SORA is then on parole or probation for an offense provided for in section 168–a(2) or (3). [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 8:06 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The policies of the Division of Parole must be of some interest to the public. [read post]
24 Nov 2013, 11:01 am
SORA applies to sex offenders incarcerated or on parole or probation on its effective date, as well as to those sentenced thereafter, thereby imposing its obligations on many persons whose sex crimes were committed prior to the effective date as held in Doe v. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 12:35 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
Lanette Linthicum, the medical director who went from $309,000 to $375,000; a $22,000 per-year increase for Carey Welebob, director of the Community Justice Assistance Division who went from $94,120 to $116,150; to a $16,600 increase for Deputy Executive Director Bryan Collier and Chief Financial Officer Jerry McGinty, who both went from $133,301 to $150,000.Several other top officials received pay bumps of more than 12 percent, including Inspector General Bruce Toney, General Counsel… [read post]
16 Nov 2013, 3:07 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Although no court has ruled on whether an appellate division decision can be utilized in making such a determination, in light of the fact that presentence reports, rap sheets, probation, parole and correction department reports, case summaries of the Board, statements by victims and defendants, and courts' own recollections have all been held to be reliable, the court cannot fathom the notion that an appellate court's decision would not be entitled to at least equal if not more… [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 10:13 am by Stephen Bilkis
Respondent was conditionally released in October of 2001 but violated his parole by possessing pornography. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 3:21 pm by Stephen Bilkis
After he entered the program, a form letter was sent on August 29, 1988 by the New York State Division of Parole to the sentencing judge, the Nassau County District Attorney's office and defendant’s attorney advising that he would be eligible for parole release consideration, was scheduled to appear before the New York State Board of Parole during the month of January, 1989 and that a determination whether to release him to parole supervision would… [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 2:49 pm by Stephen Bilkis
If classified as a sex offender, the offender must thereafter register with the Division of Criminal Justice Services 7 on each anniversary of his initial registration for a period of ten years. [read post]
2 Nov 2013, 4:06 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The Appellate Division affirmed Supreme Court's orders. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 3:12 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Accordingly, the order of the Appellate Division was affirmed by the Court, without costs. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 3:53 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The Act requires those individuals convicted of designated offenses, principally sex crimes offenses, to register with the Division of Criminal Justice Services (DCJS) ten days after their discharge from prison, or their release or parole. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 2:36 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Accordingly, court held that the order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, without costs, and the case remitted to Supreme Court for proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 11:06 am by Stephen Bilkis
Respondent remained subject to the supervision of the State Division of Parole throughout his time at correctional facility, but his parole was not revoked, apparently because his jail sentence ended days before his parole expiration date: He was freed and his parole supervision ended in November 2008, when he reached the maximum term (20 years) of his consecutive indeterminate sentences. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 4:58 pm by Stephen Bilkis
On September 3, 1997, he completed his sentence and is therefore no longer within the jurisdiction of the Division of Parole. [read post]
13 Oct 2013, 10:31 am
The statute lists factors the judge shall consider: " (1) the nature and circumstances of the offense charged, including whether the offense is a crime of violence, a violation of section 1591, a Federal crime of terrorism, or involves a minor victim or a controlled substance, firearm, explosive, or destructive device; (2) the weight of the evidence against the person; (3) the history and characteristics of the person, including-- (A) the person's character, physical and mental condition, family… [read post]
6 Oct 2013, 11:57 pm by Eloise Le Santo, Matrix
The appellant’s case was referred to the Parole Commissioners for review of the decision to revoke his licence. [read post]
5 Oct 2013, 1:38 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The Assembly bill to amend these statutes was supported by several governmental agencies, including the Division of Probation and Correctional Alternatives, the Crime Victims Board, the Office for the Prevention of Domestic Violence, and the Division of Parole, and legislative history reflects an unequivocal intent to provide greater protection to crime victims. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 10:59 am
Defendant AM was charged in an information with the misdemeanor offenses of obstructing governmental administration and assault in the third degree, as well as one count of harassment in the second degree, a violation, as a result of disruptive behavior during a parole hearing. [read post]