Search for: "Doe 25"
Results 401 - 420
of 38,348
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
do—a response that merely identifies arguments on both sides (generally a good thing to do, as explained below) but that never resolves these competing arguments to arrive at (and defend) a bottom line, is not fully answering the question asked (and is thus not likely to receive full or near-full credit).For example, if a question asks: “Does the court have subject-matter jurisdiction over the case as described? [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 2:05 pm
How does the sale-of-business exception work? [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 11:30 am
What does Josh make? [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 11:27 am
Wells’ meta-analysis does not pass muster under Rule 702 because its methodology was unclear, inconsistently applied, not replicable, and at times transparently reverse-engineered.[18] The court’s evaluation of Wells was unflinchingly critical. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 11:23 am
Nor does Plaintiff specify the nature of these potential harms. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 11:00 am
What is a non-compete agreement and what does the ban mean? [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 10:42 am
Because a SPAC does not have any business operations, the pre-IPO process for a SPAC is expedited in comparison to a traditional pre-IPO company. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
(Currently, the Law Society’s board has 31 members: 25 elected lawyers and 6 appointed lay benchers.) 5 directors are elected by and from among lawyers. 2 directors are elected by and from among notaries public (who are not also lawyers). 2 directors are elected by and from among licensed paralegals — unless there are fewer than 50 licensed paralegals in the province, in which case these 2 directors are appointed by a majority of other directors on the recommendation of the BC… [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 4:27 pm
CAISO recommends, but does not mandate, clear and transparent Requests For Information processes leading up to the LSE allocation process. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 1:26 pm
After school on April 15, a fight broke out a couple of blocks from Washington Preparatory High School in South L.A. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 12:36 pm
The appellate court then turned to the question of whether the insurer had the right to seek reimbursement of the defense fees paid after September 25, 2020. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 9:52 am
Background On 25 October 2022, the FCA published Consultation Paper 22/20 (CP22/20) setting out proposals for a new anti-greenwashing rule and SDR and investment labels regime. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 8:12 am
Yes, some administrators may do bad things, or do things for bad reasons, just as some of every class of people does bad things or does things for bad reasons. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 12:06 am
%3Ciframe%20height%3D%2252px%22%20width%3D%22100%25%22%20frameborder%3D%22no%22%20scrolling%3D%22no%22%20seamless%3D%22%22%20src%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fplayer.simplecast.com%2F44bb4612-7130-4e8e-a047-189b6deb7cec%3Fdark%3Dtrue%26amp%3Bcolor%3D000000%22%20allow%3D%22autoplay%22%3E%3C%2Fiframe%3E Privacy info. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 2:18 pm
” Arguments on April 25, 2024, will begin at 10 a.m. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 1:36 pm
The de minimis rule is per transaction, except that a taxpayer that reasonably expects to enter at least 25 similar transactions in a tax year can pool similar transactions for investigative cost efficiencies.[8] Special rules apply to pooling de minimis costs.[9] Since capitalization is typically prescribed for IP acquisitions, the period of cost recovery becomes important. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 11:16 am
" Miller, 413 U.S. at 25, 27; e.g., Hoover v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Many state and local officials host social media sites and use them to converse with followers on matters related to their governmental responsibilities, among other things.[1] Not surprisingly, many choose to block from their sites certain members of the public they find disagreeable.[2] Being disagreeable, or at least in disagreement with such actions, blocked followers sometimes sue alleging that their exclusion violates the First Amendment.[3] One of the most notable examples was a… [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 4:01 am
A parenting report was ordered by consent in September 2021 under s 211 of the Family Law Act, SBC 2011, c 25 (BC FLA). [read post]
21 Apr 2024, 7:51 pm
The structure of the TTPA regime reinforced this point, because it is on an application under s 22 (NZ)/ s 17 (Aus), for a stay of proceedings on the basis that the other court is the more appropriate forum, that a court must give effect to an exclusive jurisdiction agreement under s 25 (NZ)/ s 20 (Aus). [read post]
