Search for: "Doe Defendants 1 through 20"
Results 401 - 420
of 4,427
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Nov 2013, 10:27 am
(See the cites at page 20 & note 12 of the ACC brief.) [read post]
24 Nov 2013, 1:27 pm
Id.at *1-*2. [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 10:03 pm
The Valentine’s Day recall last year of 8,742,700 pounds of beef — all production of the Rancho Feeding Corporation from Jan. 1, 2013 through Jan. 7, 2014 — immediately sparked protests from customers who used the Petaluma, CA, slaughterhouse to process their cattle. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 10:00 pm
In a decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) dated July 20, 2018, and including AOL, Apple, Google and Yahoo as defendants, Judge Plager issued a 17-page dissent calling the current state of the law on patent eligibility to be unworkable and in need of a fix. [read post]
20 Nov 2008, 3:34 am
Each attorney represented anywhere from one to 14 sex offenders known publicly as John Does 1 through 30, and four more lawyers represented the defendants -- state, county and municipal officials.The John Does have sued the state, district attorneys, sheriffs and police chiefs, seeking to remain relatively anonymous. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 10:40 am
It points to defendant Stone’s secret communications with GRU Operative #1, the original purveyor of DNC documents, and Stone’s bragging about ties to Assange. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 12:33 am
” Though Judge Kaplan had granted the motions of the three individual defendants other than Becnel with respect to the Section 10(b) allegations against them concerning the alleged internal control allegations, he denied those three defendants’ motions to dismiss the plaintiff’s control person liability claims under Section 20(a), meaning that at least some claims against all four of the individual defendants survived the motion to… [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 6:15 pm
U.S. 4th Circuit Court of Appeals, June 20, 2008 US v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 9:07 am
However, if Defendants voluntarily disclose their source code, Uniloc is obligated to amend its P.R. 3-1(c) chart to incorporate the source code disclosure. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 10:03 pm
Samuel Lightsey and Daniel Kilgore, the two PCA criminal defendants who entered into plea bargains with the government in exchange for their truthful testimony at trial, are scheduled to be sentenced on Oct. 1. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 10:26 am
Supp. 16, 20 (E.D. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 11:00 pm
Brown’s new trial is currently scheduled to begin on September 20. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 2:40 pm
The jury found the defendants guilty in the following ways: 1. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:40 am
Custody was later resolved through a consent order dated 23 February 2015. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 1:37 am
The question is quoted as follows on the CJEU website (emphasis added by author):Must Article 13(1) of Council Regulation No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 and Article 13(1) of Regulation No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 be interpreted as prohibiting solely the use by a third party of the registered name, or must they be interpreted as prohibiting the presentation of a product protected by a designation of origin, in particular the… [read post]
14 May 2014, 9:43 am
All it does is encourages more plaintiffs to bring futile and wasteful lawsuits that impose real costs on defendants (like this case–which was inspired partially by the dicta from the Doe v. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 3:11 am
I have three other hasty stitches: 1. [read post]
16 Feb 2013, 8:58 am
Op. 93-20 (1993). [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 7:16 am
U.S. law does its bit as well--to be sure. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 3:42 pm
The Court walked through the factors it had set out in In re AIU and concluded that this clause was enforceable. [read post]
