Search for: "Doe II v. Doe I"
Results 401 - 420
of 12,287
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2023, 7:47 am
Based on Second Circuit precedent, it found that the letter constituted a Claim because it (i) alleged misconduct based on citations to theories of liability and supporting factual allegations; (ii) included specific demands for corrective action and proposed a plan for resolution of the dispute; and (iii) plainly placed Pine on notice of potential litigation involving claims it considered meritorious. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 7:30 am
Military Commissions and Hamdan II In 2006, the Supreme Court in Hamdan v. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 6:33 pm
" 31 U.S.C. 3729(b)(2)(A)(i)-(ii). [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 12:04 pm
Army Corps v. [read post]
20 Nov 2020, 9:44 am
(Lancaster II), 2020 Ark. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 3:18 am
I'm sure I'm not alone. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 8:38 am
” Vaquero v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 8:44 am
The Delhi High Court delivered a landmark judgment in the case of Manushi Sangathan v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 6:00 am
Goodell v. [read post]
22 Feb 2020, 3:35 pm
Pease v Carter & Anor (2020) EWCA Civ 17 Does an error in a section 8 notice – in this case specifically as to the earliest date on which possession proceedings can begin – invalidate the notice? [read post]
22 Feb 2020, 3:35 pm
Pease v Carter & Anor (2020) EWCA Civ 175 Does an error in a section 8 notice – in this case specifically as to the earliest date on which possession proceedings can begin – invalidate the notice? [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 6:20 am
Three years ago, I wrote a lengthy blog post on the case of Golden v. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 3:24 am
A decision from the Arizona Court of Appeals has an interesting opinion on what happens when the Quality Vendor Program does not work as planned.In Tritschler v. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 7:29 am
" Intellectual Ventures II LLC v. [read post]
28 Jan 2022, 4:15 am
Vincent does not: i. certify or approve a same-sex or unmarried couple as a foster parent or adoptive parent, or ii. conduct a home evaluation for a same-sex or unmarried couple, or iii. place a foster child with a same-sex or unmarried couple for foster care or adoption.Under the settlement, the state also agreed to pay St. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 3:00 am
I wrote about Byrd v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:28 am
II. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 2:02 pm
II, § 1, cl. 5). [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 2:35 pm
II, § 1, cl. 5). [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 7:39 am
I thought I'd pass along amicus brief that I submitted earlier this month in Doe v. [read post]
