Search for: "Doe v. Board of Medical Examiners"
Results 401 - 420
of 750
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2015, 11:53 am
The Wall Street Journal carries more on the dramatic testimony and cross examination of MI5 agents. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 11:03 am
Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Genesis Health Ventures) back in 2005): “ . . . the IRE becomes an item of evidence just as would the results of any medical examination the claimant submitted to at the request of his employer. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 10:15 am
Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 1:30 pm
Medical Association of Georgia v. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 9:11 am
“The FTC Act proscribes – and the First Amendment does not protect – deceptive and misleading advertisements. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 1:15 am
* The Future of the Boards of Appeal of the European Patent Office: Board 28 to meetOn 11 February 2015, Board 28 of the European Patent Office will meet. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 10:16 am
Nucci v. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 2:20 am
In this post, she hosts another legal analysis of the situation, this time by Catarina Holtz, a former member of the Boards of Appeal of the European Patent Office.* Life as a patent examiner according to the EPO - paid-for article in the New ScientistThe EPO has paid for an article promoting the career path of an EPO Examiner on the New Scientist. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 10:00 am
Fort Worth insurance lawyers will find the 1995, case, Darby v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 10:59 am
The court also rejected the argument that the MOU offered by the applicant to the Board of Supervisors constituted mitigation, finding that there was insufficient basis to conclude that the Board of Supervisors relied upon the MOU as any form of impact mitigation. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 4:54 am
Based on the agreed medical examiner's evaluation of Dahl's whole-person impairment and the 2005 Permanent Disability Rating Schedule, the Workers' Compensation Judge issued Dahl a 59% permanent disability rating. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 10:07 am
” In the case of Neff v. [read post]
4 Jan 2015, 2:47 am
Strictly speaking the word ‘biotech’ does not cover all ‘pharmaceutical’ matters or all ‘medical’ matters. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 2:16 am
The unrest is not, as might have been supposed, only at the level of the Examiners and regular employees, but even within the exalted ranks of the Boards of Appeal and Enlarged Board. [read post]
21 Dec 2014, 9:56 am
Martin; Nova Scotia (Workers’ Compensation Board) v. [read post]
14 Dec 2014, 12:37 pm
The Act creates the NPDB, to which medical malpractice insurance carriers, boards of medical examiners and health care entities are required to report information regarding claims, disciplinary actions and other adverse information regarding a healthcare professional. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 10:14 am
Board of Education from 1968 until 2006 when the U.S. [read post]
30 Nov 2014, 12:00 am
Toor being less than 5 feet, 10 inches tall, the height reported in the medical examiner’s report. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 4:45 pm
Board and care facilities do not provide skilled nursing care. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 11:24 am
It could have been better, at least for non-drug device defendants (see the dissenting part of the concurrance/dissent), but compared to Azzarello the result is excellent.Tincher’s Impact on Drugs and Medical DevicesFirst, how does Tincheraffect drugs and medical devices, the primary focus of this blog? [read post]
