Search for: "Doe v. Superior Court"
Results 401 - 420
of 8,631
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Dec 2013, 4:10 am
In Beaton v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 11:04 am
Superior Court (Sheridan) - B241137, filed August 16, 2012, the court held that employer’s failure to renew employee’s fixed-term contract does not give rise to a claim for wrongful termination in violation of public policy. [read post]
22 May 2017, 8:56 am
On May 22, 2017, by a vote of 5-2, the Supreme Court of Ohio dismissed Rush v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 9:31 pm
Finally, the Court held that the Supreme Court's decision in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 9:50 am
Superior Court, 128 Cal. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 12:04 pm
Nor, we think, does moving to transfer venue. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 8:47 am
Jackson (election contest): https://electioncases.osu.edu/case/ward-v-jackson/ From the Maricopa County Superior Court Judge’s decision: “The Court finds no misconduct, no fraud, and no effect on the outcome of the election. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 7:06 pm
Roach v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 9:41 am
Earlier this month, the Quebec Court of Appeal unanimously overturned the earlier 2008 Quebec Superior Court decision in Option Consommateurs v. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 6:57 pm
The court's opinion does not even mention Adams. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 4:53 am
In Vaughn Development v. [read post]
20 May 2013, 7:38 am
The court of appeals in Friddle v. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 10:15 am
Lidow v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 5:02 pm
Justice Aldrich begins this opinion by saying: "If an insured throws someone into a swimming pool intending to get the other person wet, but by mistake does not throw hard enough and so the latter lands on the pool's cement step and suffers injuries, is the incident an 'accident' within the meaning of insurance law? [read post]
23 Oct 2007, 11:30 am
In an unusual decision released October 5, 2007, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice relied on its parens patriae power to assume jurisdiction over two children who habitually resided with their father in Saudi Arabia at the time of the hearing.In Johnson v. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 2:46 pm
Supreme Court (USSC), Missouri v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 6:04 am
” Romero v. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 3:46 pm
The first was "negligent marketing," which the Superior Court limited strictly to overpromotion:Appellant next argues that her claim for “negligent marketing” is cognizable under Baldino v. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 3:18 am
Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Daniel J. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 6:00 am
Black Diamond Hope House Inc. v. [read post]
