Search for: "Doe v. United States"
Results 401 - 420
of 40,120
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2022, 12:34 pm
See United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 10:23 am
For example, the decision states that a district court does not have the power to suspend a sentence, citing United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 10:15 am
Four years after a plurality of the United States Supreme Court in Mitchell v. [read post]
12 Jul 2024, 4:00 am
In Chestnut v. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 4:50 am
The Supreme Court’s decision last week in United States v. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 5:24 pm
Recall that in Doe... [read post]
29 Oct 2023, 8:21 am
In United States v. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 10:10 am
The Supreme Court held in United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 12:11 pm
Appellant makes an argument, it's not a very good one, and it gets rejected.But here's the somewhat unusual fact:The seizure at issue involved the United States seizing $100 million.For that amount of money at stake, you'd think that the appellant might be able to come up with some better arguments on appeal. [read post]
7 May 2018, 12:10 pm
Rebekah Daniel served honorably as a Lieutenant in the United States Navy, and she worked as a labor and delivery nurse stationed at the Naval Hospital in Bremerton, Washington. . . . [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 6:30 am
The case is United States of America v. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 6:27 pm
The United States Supreme Court yesterday issued its decision in Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 10:57 am
State v. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 12:15 am
AM Trust v. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 3:49 am
[hereinafter Reuters, Judge strikes down plea][2] Id.; See United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 6:28 am
” Martin v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 5:33 pm
Doe v. [read post]
11 May 2009, 9:53 pm
A trial court has ruled that a defendant, once extradited and later outside the United States, can be subject to a new extradition request, and certainly does not require dismissal of the underlying indictment. . [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:06 am
As the Court said in Citizens United, “The fact that speakers may have influence over or access to elected officials does not mean that these officials are corrupt. . . . [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 9:41 am
United States, Part 2: What to Do If the FSIA Does Not Apply? [read post]
