Search for: "Does 1-100 "
Results 401 - 420
of 12,652
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Nov 2005, 8:05 am
Under Sec. 301(b)(1)(A), a "qualified contribution shall be allowed only to the extent that the aggregate of such contributions does not exceed the excess of the taxpayer's contribution base (as defined in subparagraph (F) of section 170(b)(1) of such Code) over the amount of all other charitable contributions allowed under such section 170(b)(1)”. [read post]
1 Feb 2025, 11:57 am
Does that mean © needs to last 100 years? [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 6:30 am
Ladder falls killed over 100 workers in the last 10 years. [read post]
25 Jul 2015, 4:30 am
As per [100], the High Court does not consider “that on a proper interpretation of Digital Rights Ireland it is necessary for restrictions on passing on information about communications data outside the EU to be embodied in statute”. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 5:42 am
Defense attorneys argued that a “range” of 100-500 class members does not adequately establish numerosity, but the district court stated that the defense argument “miss[es] the point entirely. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 5:01 am
Does 1-20, No. 08-2147, 2008 WL 2264485 (N.D. [read post]
13 Feb 2018, 5:45 am
Code §154.062(b)(1). [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 1:29 pm
§ 841(b)(1)(A)(viii)'s threshold of "50 grams of methamphetamine" does not mean entire substance must consist of 100% pure methamphetamine. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 3:02 pm
This article furthermore gives in paragraph (1) examples of criteria to be taken into consideration by the Board of Appeal when exercising its discretion: complexity of the new subject-matter, current state of the file and the need for procedural economy. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 8:20 am
It does not reject the petitioner’s filing. [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 4:09 am
The impugned decision does not state that any further ground for opposition prejudiced the maintenance of the patent as granted. [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 4:09 am
The impugned decision does not state that any further ground for opposition prejudiced the maintenance of the patent as granted. [read post]
10 Jan 2010, 10:00 am
document_id=24957921&access_key=key-2kirwaooi5ybdtq5gf7f&page=1&version=1&viewMode=list"> [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 10:10 am
The delay in the two-midnight enforcement does not mean hospitals should delay in implementing their revised admission policies to comply with the new inpatient admission rules. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 5:46 am
The State also sought forfeiture of the truck from which the movies had been sold under 34-24-1-1(a)(1)(B) which allows for the seizure of vehicles that are used to facilitate the transportation of "stolen . . . or converted property" valued at $100 or more. [read post]
16 Aug 2021, 12:07 pm
Under the amendments, employers with more than 100 employees in Illinois must certify to the Illinois Department of Labor (IDOL) compliance with the Equal Pay Act by obtaining an Equal Pay registration certificate from the state Department of Labor. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 7:14 pm
Subsection (a) does not preclude a court, in an appropriate case, from deciding that additional securities of the type described in subsection (a)(1), (2), or (3) acquired as a result of the testator’s ownership of the later-acquired securities pass under the devise in either of these two cases, or in other cases if appropriate. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 6:52 am
In the annex to the summons to oral proceedings the board presented its preliminary opinion that, inter alia:- the ground of Article 100(b) EPC did not hold against the main request;- the subject-matter of claims 1 and 8 of the main request lacked novelty both over the content of the disclosure of D1 and over the content of the disclosure of D2; and- claims 1 and 8 of the first auxiliary request contravened the requirements of Article 123(2) EPC.IV. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 6:04 am
I'm less sure about this (if it weren't the summer I'd consult with some colleagues on it), but I think that the following, from a recently published article in a top-ten law review, is wrong (describing the concept of linear and non-linear dose-response rates): "The relationship might be linear, inwhich case if 1 gram of exposure causes a 1-in-100 risk of cancer, 0.01 grams of exposure should cause a 1-in-10,000 risk of cancer; or, the… [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 4:47 am
Main request1.1 The opponent raised objections against claim 1 of the main request under Article 100(c) and (b) EPC. [read post]
