Search for: "Does 1-51" Results 401 - 420 of 3,921
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2018, 6:41 am by Bartosz Krakowiak
Finally, the Court (making several references to another EU trademark case with Polish background: Agencja Wydawnicza Technopol / OHIM, C-51/10) confirmed that the earlier decisions of the EUIPO and the Board of Appeal were not in breach of the principles of protection of legitimate expectations and legal certainty. [read post]
10 Apr 2020, 6:20 am
  It does so through the lens of the theoretical advances undertaken through the leadership core of the Chinese Communist Party as it reflects on and moves forward from the great era of “Reform and Opening Up. [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 5:03 am by Robert Kampen
While simply paraphrasing regulatory language might not be that helpful, the VA does expand its insights on other Briefs, highlighted below. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 6:01 pm by Kevin Poulsen and Kim Zetter
(1:51:25 PM) Manning: i’d have to ask assange (1:51:53 PM) Manning: i zerofilled the original (1:51:54 PM) Lamo: why do you answer to him? [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 6:40 am
Does 1–10, No. 10–5022, 2011 WL 5444622 (U.S. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 5:16 am by Susan Brenner
-controlled territory or premises” (Rule 51(b)(5). [read post]
23 Aug 2015, 2:21 pm by Chris Jaglowitz
Strangely, however, s. 51(1) does not seem to prohibit contracting work to unlicensed persons. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 4:41 am
 Can the same be said also for copyright owners, or does such duty of vigilance only apply to third parties, including link providers? [read post]
22 Apr 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Index No. 650940/11 Appeal No. 51 Case No. 2022-03934 Irving Ruderman, Plaintiff-Appellant, vNew York State Insurance Fund, Defendant-Respondents, John/Jane Does I-XX, Defendants. [read post]
22 Apr 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Index No. 650940/11 Appeal No. 51 Case No. 2022-03934 Irving Ruderman, Plaintiff-Appellant, vNew York State Insurance Fund, Defendant-Respondents, John/Jane Does I-XX, Defendants. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 2:42 am
Meredith) argue is that the 51% math is illogical because the majority opinion is doing the calculation pretending it does not know the outcome. [read post]