Search for: "Doles v. Doles"
Results 401 - 420
of 698
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2011, 7:07 am
In MHL Tek, LLC v. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 1:39 pm
It's either conspicuous consumption, a dedication to the arts, or a way to warehouse 22-28 year olds, who in Europe would go live with their parents and get on the dole, but we must be getting something out of them. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 2:20 pm
Your views are welcome, in the comments.Morris v. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 9:23 am
His general findings are reported in Part V, and details about each case are in the appendix. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 4:13 pm
Lopez and United States v. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 10:39 pm
Dole, 870 F.2d 1419, 1437-38 (9th Cir. 1989). [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 8:55 am
Alan Ehrlich will be presenting Ramifications of Stanford v. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 12:28 pm
United States (1992), and United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 4:59 pm
Dole, then nothing is. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 1:01 am
: Biotechnology patent applicants (Patently-O) US: Bayh Dole Act a failure? [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 5:26 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 5:26 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 6:26 am
Greenhouse also names Brown v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 5:54 am
The decision in Leland Stanford Junior Univeristy v. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 1:22 pm
In Stern v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 1:38 pm
., v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 7:00 am
New York City Transit Auth., 148 F.R.D. 56, 63 (E.D.N.Y.1993) (citing Dole v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 6:34 am
KSR v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 2:21 am
(Docket Report) US moves closer to Australia on assignment of employee inventions: Bayh-Dole no saviour for government-funded research institutes: Board of Trustees for Leland Stanford Junior University v Roche Molecular Systems, Inc (IP Whiteboard) US: Stem Cell Research Advancement Act of 2011, H.R. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 8:56 pm
For the new folks, I keep the names on these submissions anonymous (picked at random from the Social Security Administration’s Popular Names database) so feel free to send me an email if you’ve got a question but don’t want to risk having your name in print A point politely ignored by nearly every law school nationwide even as they dole out admission to legacy applicants of alums who benefited from segregationist admission policies [read post]
