Search for: "Douglas County State"
Results 401 - 420
of 1,968
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2017, 2:53 am
Paved county roads are the best, state highways are next. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 8:00 am
The Surgery Center at Lone Tree, 2015-CV-30922, Douglas County District Court, Colo. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 4:43 am
”) At Oral Argument Arguing Counsel Douglas R. [read post]
23 Apr 2017, 11:00 pm
Douglas County School District, 580 U.S. ____ (2017), the Supreme Court held that "[t]o meet its substantive obligation under the IDEA (Individuals with Disabilities Education Act), a school district must offer an IEP (Individualized Education Program) reasonably calculated to enable a child to make progress appropriate in light of the child's circumstances. [read post]
23 Apr 2017, 11:00 pm
Douglas County School District, 580 U.S. ____ (2017), the Supreme Court held that "[t]o meet its substantive obligation under the IDEA (Individuals with Disabilities Education Act), a school district must offer an IEP (Individualized Education Program) reasonably calculated to enable a child to make progress appropriate in light of the child's circumstances. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 8:51 am
By Douglas Mirell, Charles Harder, and Dilan Esper of Harder, Mirell and Abrams. [read post]
14 Apr 2017, 4:02 am
Douglas County School District, in which the court held that the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act requires a school to offer an “individualized education program” reasonably calculated to allow the student to progress appropriately in light of the child’s circumstances, attempting to explain why “each side (parents and school officials) still thinks that they won. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 3:53 am
Douglas County School District, in which the court held that the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act requires a school to offer an “individualized education program” reasonably calculated to allow the student to progress appropriately in light of the child’s circumstances, observing that the ruling “shifts the position of the school district from one that must satisfy a minimum standard to one that must offer a reasonable hope of progress. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 4:45 am
Douglas Berman has this blog’s opinion analysis. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 4:38 am
Douglas County School District, that constitute “important victories for civil rights plaintiffs. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 4:41 am
United States. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 6:00 am
Douglas County School District. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:09 am
Clearly, you liked the nation’s capital just fine: you chose to stay on for college at American University and only left the city for the wild and distant climes of Montgomery County, Maryland in ’66, once you had your Ph.D in business. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:03 am
Douglas County School District, which held that the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act requires a school to offer an “individualized education program” reasonably calculated to allow the student to progress appropriately in light of the child’s circumstances. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 3:48 am
Douglas County School District, holding that the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act requires a school to offer an “individualized education program” reasonably calculated to allow the student to progress appropriately in light of the child’s circumstances. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 4:18 am
Douglas County School District, holding that the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act requires a school to offer an “individualized education program” reasonably calculated to allow the student to progress appropriately in light of the child’s circumstances. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 4:06 pm
His co-Defendants are the “Gay Zombies,” who have the pseudonyms, Adam Zombie, Brian Zombie, Christopher Zombie, Douglas Zombie, Edward Zombie, and Frank Zombie, along with the unidentified financial backers. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 7:08 am
Douglas County School Dist., decided on March 22. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 4:41 am
The first was County of Los Angeles v. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 5:31 pm
The court rejected the argument that prior extensive publication rendered the material in public domain and held (citing Douglas v Hello! [read post]
