Search for: "Downs v. Powell"
Results 401 - 420
of 536
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2019, 11:33 am
In Morrison v. [read post]
1 May 2022, 4:30 pm
A data breach compromised personal data of over 100 U.K. army recruits and shut down the army’s online recruitment portal for more than a month. [read post]
27 Feb 2022, 4:30 pm
Judgment was reserved and will be handed down on 28 February 2022. [read post]
28 Jul 2017, 9:06 am
In an opinion that in many ways previews his opinion striking down Texas’ anti-sodomy law twenty-four years later in Lawrence v. [read post]
Following Judge Sutton’s rejection of the “inactivity” argument, the Supreme Court can take its time
5 Aug 2011, 1:00 pm
Lopez (1995) and United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 7:08 am
She said, “The trial was called the United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 9:23 am
" In Regan v. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 9:38 am
On December 22, 2016, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in State v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 7:15 am
The four Citizens United v. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 10:57 am
Powell that the exclusionary rule could not be raised in federal habeas cases. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 6:15 am
Previously in Regents of Univ of Cal v Bakke, Justice Powell wrote in his solo opinion that the attainment of a “diverse student body” is a compelling state interest for an institution of higher education. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 4:28 pm
Previously in Regents of Univ of Cal v Bakke (17 EPD ¶8402 (1978)), Justice Powell wrote in his solo opinion that the attainment of a “diverse student body” is a compelling state interest for an institution of higher education. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 7:08 am
Moreover, in Chisholm v. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:20 am
COVID-19 Pandemic Issues The Honorable Susan V. [read post]
7 May 2009, 9:56 am
FergusonPlessy v. [read post]
20 Dec 2015, 4:17 pm
On 16 December 2015 Dingemans J heard an application for permission to pay money out of court in the case of Price v Powell, following settlement of the case. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 12:30 pm
The Texas Supreme Court considered both of these questions this week in the case of Powell v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 12:10 pm
Earlier this month, retired Justice John Paul Stevens sat down with one of his former clerks, Stanford law professor Jeffrey Fisher, for an interview. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 7:58 am
Unlike with Trump in the impeachment trial, the First Amendment clearly does apply here, and it has a very high standard for incitement under Brandenburg v. [read post]
21 Apr 2022, 6:30 am
Fishkin and Forbath are a little hard to pin down on this point. [read post]
