Search for: "Downs v. Powell" Results 401 - 420 of 536
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Nov 2010, 1:15 pm
 In a nutshell, when Stevens joined fellow centrists Potter Stewart and Lewis Powell to co-author the lead opinion in Gregg v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am by chief
These were resisted by the then government on the basis that they would be watering down the effects of DTs and "would effectively require a double possession hearing". [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am by chief
These were resisted by the then government on the basis that they would be watering down the effects of DTs and "would effectively require a double possession hearing". [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 9:47 pm by Simon Gibbs
In Ahmed v Powell [2003] EWHC 9011 (Costs), Master Hurst considered the matter in some detail: “Note 47.14.7 ‘Rights of audience on detailed assessment’ in the White Book is the note referred to by the District Judge at the hearing on 10 July 2002. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 9:11 am by Brian Evans
” –Supreme Court Justice Lewis Powell, to his biographer in 1991. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 12:34 am by INFORRM
Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit  in Powell Books, Inc. d/b/a LLC v. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 3:34 am by Guest Blogger
Yet the Court hasn’t struck down a law on so-called “nondelegation” grounds for over 70 years. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 1:51 pm by Eugene Volokh
(McDonald calls such an approach “watered-down” incorporation.) [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 2:59 am
Members in Powell River, BC were being told by their local Ministry of Environment Conservation Officers to cut down their fruit trees and then being threatened with fines if they did not comply. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:32 am by Russ Bensing
  A routine traffic stop led to the pat-down of the defendant in State v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 3:51 am by Russ Bensing
  (Discussion of Schatzer and Powell here.) [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 12:27 am by Transplanted Lawyer
That's about as provocative a post title as I could think of for a more detailed report on the more interesting of the two cases issued yesterday striking down the Federal Defense of Marriage Act, Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. [read post]