Search for: "Drug Abuse v. Human Rights"
Results 401 - 420
of 475
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Sep 2021, 2:12 pm
United States State v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 11:34 am
The June 28, 2012 Supreme Court National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
15 May 2016, 4:20 pm
On 10 May 2016, HHJ Moloney QC heard applications in the cases of Ghuman v Ghuman and Hussain v Feeney. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 4:16 am
" (Gregg v. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 4:26 pm
If there is a lapse in annual appropriations, the Anti-Deficiency Act generally requires agencies to stop spending or obligating funds, unless an exception applies; however, government employees can continue to perform activities involving the safety of human life or the protection of property, and to carry out constitutional functions. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 12:23 am
Criminal Sanction Impact.01/08/07 REFERRED TO CODES01/30/07 1ST REPORT CAL.5901/31/07 2ND REPORT CAL.LAW / CORRECTNSS1905
SAMPSON -- Authorizes certain inmates serving an indeterminate sentence to receive good time allowances of up to 1/3 of their minimum sentencesSUMM : Amd SS803 & 805, Cor L Authorizes inmates serving indeterminate sentences of imprisonment for offenses involving controlled substances and marihuana to receive good time allowances against the minimum terms of their… [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 3:36 am
Schwab v. [read post]
4 May 2023, 3:14 pm
In the lawsuit EEOC v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 10:58 am
According to a lawsuit filed (EEOC v. [read post]
30 Mar 2008, 12:03 pm
The opinion is Alabama State Bar v. [read post]
31 Oct 2021, 9:00 pm
HB 1797 prohibits an individual who is the perpetrator of a finding of heinous and shocking abuse by the Department of Human Services from working with or providing services related to child care. [read post]
31 Oct 2021, 9:00 pm
HB 1797 prohibits an individual who is the perpetrator of a finding of heinous and shocking abuse by the Department of Human Services from working with or providing services related to child care. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 11:42 am
In Arizona v. [read post]
5 Feb 2025, 10:26 pm
The complaint asserts that the executive order exceeds presidential authority and causes irreparable harm by stripping constitutionally protected rights from children born to immigrants (e.g., the right to remain in the United States, access public benefits, and participate fully in civic life) and destabilizes their families, potentially leaving children stateless and separating them from their parents.Update-1: On Jan. 27, 2025, Franco Aleman v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 11:33 am
Trial court judges are, under their judicial robes, human beings. [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 7:22 am
That is to say that if a public authority sticks to the requirements of the act it is protected against claims under the human rights act. [read post]
21 Oct 2024, 4:45 pm
Ring v. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 12:30 pm
Your case is dismissed under Rooker-Feldman and Younger *and* Heck v. [read post]
19 May 2007, 10:12 am
He pleaded guilty at his 2002 trial and refused to allow mitigation evidence to be presented on his behalf, including of his abusive childhood at the hands of his father. [read post]
