Search for: "ENGLAND v. STATE"
Results 401 - 420
of 3,656
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2011, 7:37 pm
The Supreme Court will soon hear oral arguments in Sorrell v. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 5:09 am
In addition to the key case of Rottmann v Freistaat Bayern [2010] ECR I-1449 numerous other authorities such as Kaur [2001] All ER (EC) 250, McCarthy [2011] All ER (EC) 729 Zambrano [2011] ECR I-1177 and Dereci [2011] ECR I-11315 were analysed and applied to his case. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 1:34 am
In Faraday Reinsurance Co Ltd v Howden North America Inc & Anor [2012] EWCA Civ 980, the Court of Appeal ruled that the judge at first instance, Judge Beatson, was entitled to conclude that English proceedings would serve a useful purpose when he refused to set aside a service out of the jurisdiction of negative declaratory proceedings by Faraday against Howden.In the Commercial Court decision, Beatson J refused to set aside the service because he found that the policy in question was… [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 1:45 pm
This new editorial authored by three physicians in the New England Journal of Medicine suggests a (clever?) [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:59 am
Applying in Bah v UK (2012) 54 EHRR 21 he held that the discrimination was justified on the facts of HC’s case. [read post]
24 May 2023, 4:16 pm
Shute, 499 U.S. 585, 595 (1991), and M/S Bremen v. [read post]
2 Sep 2020, 12:21 am
On 22 June 2017, the Administrative Court of the High Court of England and Wales declared the two passages in the guidance under challenge to be unlawful. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 8:08 am
She then decided to bring a claim for financial relief under English law on the basis that she had purchased a property in England in 2014 and, since 2017, had been living in England permanently. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 12:18 am
In the case of Nicholas G Jones v (1) Environcom Limited and (2) Environcom England Limited [2009] EWHC 16 the Commercial Court was asked to determine, as a preliminary issue, whether a claimant insurer could be granted an application for security of its costs. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 11:30 pm
This blog was co-authored by Bwanika Lwanga, Candidate Attorney The English judgment of Butler-Sloss & Ors v The Charity Commission for England and Wales & Anor [2022] EWHC 974 (Ch), considered the question of whether the trustees of two charitable trusts could adopt investment policies that exclude profitable potential investments on the basis that the investments would conflict with the principal purposes of the charities which are environmental protection and the relief… [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 12:02 pm
The case is entitled Nelson v. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 1:33 pm
Two years later, in Commonwealth v. [read post]
5 Apr 2022, 8:53 am
However, as Croydon had stated that it was not relying on a right of forfeiture, the appeal was allowed in part. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 3:43 am
In this post, Ross Ludlow, Legal Support Assistant at Matrix Chambers, comments on the case of R v Maughan (Northern Ireland) [2022] UKSC 13. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 2:43 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Chrysostomou, R v [2010] EWCA Crim 1403 (24 June 2010) Attorney Generals Reference No 114 – 115 of 2009 [2010] EWCA Crim 1459 (24 June 2010) Lee, R v [2010] EWCA Crim 1404 (24 June 2010) High Court (Administrative Court) K, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWHC 1528 (Admin) (24 June 2010) HM (Malawi), R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home… [read post]
17 May 2011, 5:30 pm
In the second post, the present position will be compared with the current state of the law in Germany, with some references to the law in the United States of America. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 5:14 pm
State v. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 8:34 am
State v. [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 9:30 pm
Dagenhart, United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 6:39 pm
State v. [read post]
