Search for: "EUGENE SCALIA" Results 401 - 420 of 524
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2011, 6:17 am by James Bickford
  The National Journal reports that Justice Sotomayor compared herself to Justice Antonin Scalia—both are, per her description, “[l]oud, boisterous, in-your-face. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 2:08 pm by Mike Rappaport
One would expect that Justice Scalia and Thomas, at least, would disapprove of this description of what the Court is supposed to be doing. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 4:24 am by Broc Romanek
As Ted Allen noted in ISS's Blog: "While it can be difficult to predict the outcome of a case based on oral arguments, the judges appeared receptive to the arguments by Eugene Scalia, the lawyer for the business groups, that the SEC inconsistently judged how frequently the rule would be used and how much it might cost. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 2:49 pm by Ted Allen
They contend that the SEC acted in an arbitrary and capricious manner in its treatment of state corporate laws, failed to properly weigh the costs and benefits of access and the availability of less costly alternatives, and failed to adequately consider the impact on competition and capital formation.While it can be difficult to predict the outcome of a case based on oral arguments, the judges appeared receptive to the arguments by Eugene Scalia, the lawyer for the business… [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 12:00 pm by Jenna Greene
Represented by Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher partner Eugene Scalia, the Business Roundtable and the U.S. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 12:30 pm by Ted Allen
 The business groups are represented by Eugene Scalia of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, who represented the Chamber of Commerce in its successful challenge to the mutual fund rules. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 12:16 pm
Eugene Volokh, Four Justices on the Fourth Amendment, on Volokh Conspiracy: An interesting statement respecting the denial of certiorari today in Huber v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 7:49 am by Nabiha Syed
At the Volokh Conspiracy, Eugene Volokh reproduces excerpts from the statement. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 8:27 am by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) An interesting statement respecting the denial of certiorari today in Huber v. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 6:34 pm by Stewart Baker
 It was like replacing a real, full-blooded Scalia dissent with the notation “Justice Scalia dissents. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm by axd10
Death justice Rehnquist, Scalia, Thomas and the contradictions of the death penalty. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 7:42 pm
 Eugene Volokh nicely excerpts the relevant portions of the concurrence in the judgment and the majority opinion. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 9:07 pm by John Elwood
(John Elwood) So Orin and Eugene blogged the motion asking Judge Reinhardt to recuse himself from the Prop 8 case; and Eugene blogged both Judge Reinhardt’s initial order denying the motion to recuse and linked the memorandum opinion in which the Judge discussed his reasons for not recusing himself. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 3:02 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) Yesterday, the Tenth Circuit voted 5–4 not to rehear the Utah roadside cross memorial case, American Atheists, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 1:46 am by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
Introduction: When Eugene Scalia, son of Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, filed an amicus brief arguing that monetary relief for a breach of fiduciary duty was "traditionally, typically, and exclusively" available in courts of equity, the suggestion was clear that the remedial provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) of 1974  were capable of dividing even families. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 2:35 pm by David Lat
[National Review]* A careful dissection of my write-up of Justice Scalia’s recent remarks to the Federalist Society, by Professor Ann Althouse. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 7:37 am by Kali Borkoski
At the Volokh Conspiracy, Eugene Volokh reports that the Court has called for a response from the state in Herrera v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 1:54 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) Quintessential Justice Scalia, from the oral argument in the First Amendment violent video games case: JUSTICE GINSBURG: Is there — you’ve been asked questions about the vagueness of this and the problem for the seller to know what’s good and what’s bad. [read post]