Search for: "EXXON CORPORATION"
Results 401 - 420
of 822
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Feb 2012, 11:56 am
Exxon Mobile Corporation from the Fourteenth Court of Appeals exemplifies the forfeiture scenario and the consequences that can arise when those programs do not comply with the Texas Covenant not to Compete Act. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 4:07 pm
Meantime, corporate profits continue to rise and corporations are sitting on a record amount of cash. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 1:56 pm
In response, States adopted what were called “marketing acts” to allow farmers “to continue to produce singly, but . . . to emulate the efforts and practices of industrial corporations in processing, preparing for market and marketing farm products. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 8:03 am
Many of the largest corporations are represented on its board. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 8:03 am
Many of the largest corporations are represented on its board. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 1:57 pm
Imperialism is the policy of the US Government and corporations. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 8:56 am
Exxon Mobil Corporation and Attorney General of Canada over the trademark "Marche Express. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 1:23 pm
Exxon Mobil Corporation and Attorney General of Canada (Registrar of Trade-marks), the Court considered whether Esso’s “Marché Express” mark is too descriptive of the services it provides as a gas-station convenience store. [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 9:48 am
Exxon declined to comment. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 1:41 pm
John Griffiths Cycle Corporation, Limited (15 RPC 105). [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 11:21 am
The audit committee chair at the Louisiana-Pacific Corporation said that, in the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, Congress explicitly rejected mandated audit firm rotation. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 11:20 am
Welch Jr. 1981-2001 $417,361,902 Exxon Mobil Corp. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 8:45 am
Exxon Mobil. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 9:18 am
To wit: SHELBY PROIE; KAREN MUNRO; Case #3:11-05955-BHS PATRICIA SYKES; ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND, a non-profit corporation; and PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS, INC., a non-profit corporation, Plaintiffs, v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 1:11 pm
It went on, There is no indication, nor is their reason to expect, that a corporation is any more rent-seeking it its political forays than an unincorporated sole proprietorship, partnership, or limited liability corporation, all of which are primarily viewed as economic actors, or than individuals, all of which are permitted to make political contributions….While the concept of corporate contributions evokes images of organizations like Exxon or… [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 12:31 pm
Forget the idea that they’re public servants; the truth is that, in every way that matters, they work for Exxon and its kin. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 2:41 am
What the appointees have in common, consumer groups, environmental watchdogs and other Perry critics say, is a strong enough leaning toward corporate interests that it’s nearly impossible for individuals to win cases against large corporations. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 1:59 am
What the appointees have in common, consumer groups, environmental watchdogs and other Perry critics say, is a strong enough leaning toward corporate interests that it’s nearly impossible for individuals to win cases against large corporations. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 4:30 am
Exxon Mobil Corp., 657 F.3d 272 (5th Cir. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 10:47 am
Circuit Holds Corporations Not Immune from ATS Claims. [read post]
