Search for: "Ed Sullivan" Results 401 - 420 of 805
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Dec 2013, 10:29 am by Joe Patrice
Ed. note: Merry Christmas! [read post]
1 Dec 2013, 8:05 pm by Walter Olson
Organizers of college conference on “intersection of health, humanities and disabilities” forget to make it accessible [Inside Higher Ed] Law forbade disclosure re: sex offender classmate, now Seattle schools are paying assault victim $700,000 [KIRO] Update: Lehigh U. student who sued over C+ grade won’t get a new trial, judge rules [Allentown Morning Call, earlier] U.K.: “Refusal to allow your child to attend this trip will result in a Racial Discrimination note… [read post]
16 Nov 2013, 9:00 pm by J. Gordon Hylton
The next public event that I remember with clarity was the Bears beating the Giants, 14-10, in the NFL championship game at the end of December, and then the Beatles showing up on Ed Sullivan the following February. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 7:06 am by Joe May
Lobbying “Exclusive: Washington lobbying law firm in merger talks – sources” by Casey Sullivan in Reuters. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 7:06 am by Joe May
Lobbying “Exclusive: Washington lobbying law firm in merger talks – sources” by Casey Sullivan in Reuters. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 4:30 am by David Markus
O’Sullivan, took notice: “A lot of people here for one person. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 3:31 pm by Alfred Brophy
 You may recall that Konefsky and Sullivan wrote about similar issues in the Chronicle of Higher Ed a while back. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 6:14 am by Staci Zaretsky
Ed. note: In honor of Columbus Day (and Canadian Thanksgiving), Above the Law will be on a reduced publication schedule today. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 6:20 am
"... a Don Cheadle self-congratulatory tribute to how well television covered the Kennedy assassination, followed by a Carrie Underwood tribute to the Beatles' performance on the Ed Sullivan Show having been fifty years ago (next year)." [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 9:09 am by Kevin Smith, J.D.
Dodger Productions and involved a seven second video clip from the Ed Sullivan Show shown on a screen at the end of the first act of the Broadway show Jersey Boys. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 4:00 am by Devlin Hartline
Cross-posted on the Law Theories blog. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 10:25 am by Eric
  The Keller case was consolidated with a similar suit filed by former UCLA basketball player Ed O’Bannon and several others, which also challenged the NCAA’s restriction against players exploiting their rights of publicity while in college as an antitrust violation. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 11:06 am by Rebecca Tushnet
The NYT reports on a lawsuit by the creators of one Beatles tribute performance against another Beatles tribute performance: The suit contends that the new musical — which steers clear of those contentious “Let It Be” recording sessions, focusing instead on peppier Beatles moments like the “Ed Sullivan Show” appearance — owes a significant debt to “Rain,” from the musical arrangements to the between-song patter to the mop-toppy… [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 9:30 pm by Brady Sullivan
    The rule HHS issued at that time contained the same language as the August 2011 rule, still dictating that a religious employer could only gain exemption if he or she, among other requirements, “primarily employ[ed] persons who share the religious tenets of the organization. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
Strangelove" (16) "Flight of the Conchords" (4) "Game Change" (2) "Get Smart" (1) "Gran Torino" (10) "Grey Gardens" (13) "I Shouldn't Be Alive" (4) "Limelight" (3) "Meet the Press" (20) "Moby Dick" (5) "My Dinner with Andre" (34) "Mystery Science Theater" (2) "Project Runway" (78) "Romy and Michele's High School Reunion" (3) "Seinfeld" (72) "Sex and the City" (14) "Slacker" (11) "Slumdog Millionaire" (16) "SNL" (60) "Sopranos" (50) "South Park" (71) "Star Trek" (12) "Star Wars" (25) "Survivor" (50)… [read post]
28 May 2013, 11:10 am by Charon QC
Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964), which held that a public official could only prevail in a defamation action if the public official proves that the defendant either knew that the statement was false or recklessly disregarded whether the communication was false, a fault standard known as “actual malice. [read post]
28 May 2013, 11:10 am by Charon QC
Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964), which held that a public official could only prevail in a defamation action if the public official proves that the defendant either knew that the statement was false or recklessly disregarded whether the communication was false, a fault standard known as “actual malice. [read post]
20 May 2013, 12:01 pm by Ray Dowd
Dowd Find Ray Dowd at Dunnington Bartholow & Miller LLP Copyright Litigation Handbook (West 6th Ed. 2011) by Raymond J. [read post]