Search for: "Edwards v. California"
Results 401 - 420
of 1,019
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Dec 2015, 4:01 am
Coverage of yesterday’s second argument, Franchise Tax Board of California v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 3:53 pm
Judge Sidney Thomas The three-judge motions panel — consisting of Judges Edward Leavy, Michael Daly Hawkins, and Sidney Thomas — has issued a stay pending appeal in Perry v. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 5:48 am
"' Today, The Sacramento Bee reports, California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger intends to file a court-mandated plan to address overcrowding in California prisons. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 9:15 am
Edward T. [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 8:36 am
Edward T. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 5:05 am
Yesterday the Court heard oral argument in Young v. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 4:30 am
Duane Morris LLP v Astor Holdings Inc. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 12:06 pm
The court, in Porter v. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 4:24 pm
In a ruling on Monday that has just been made public, state District Court Judge Edward D. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 9:07 pm
” Citing Palmer v. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 4:42 am
California and United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 8:01 am
Galante, 176 Cal.App.4th 1226, 1237, 98 Cal.Rptr.3d 585 (Cal.Ct.App.2009) and Edwards v. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 8:54 pm
Apple was originally assigned to Judge Edward M. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 3:55 pm
However, a recent ruling by a Deputy Labor Commissioner in California, coupled with at least two federal class action cases currently pending in California, have thrown the debate wide-open as to whether Uber and Lyft can legitimately classify their drivers as independent contractors. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 3:55 pm
However, a recent ruling by a Deputy Labor Commissioner in California, coupled with at least two federal class action cases currently pending in California, have thrown the debate wide-open as to whether Uber and Lyft can legitimately classify their drivers as independent contractors. [read post]
14 May 2008, 2:12 pm
This could be a wacky case like Adlerstein v. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 11:33 am
During the Senate’s consideration of the DTSA, California’s Sen. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 12:34 am
Finally, this part of the book discusses the impact of the ruling in Regents of the University of California v Eli Lilly & Co and how this case has influenced the application of the written description requirement in the US. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 10:10 am
Latest Filing in Jewel v. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 3:35 am
Gans weighs in on the argument in Armstrong v. [read post]
