Search for: "Edwards v. Cross" Results 401 - 420 of 637
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2022, 11:33 am by admin
Australia 277 (2002). [7] KSR International Co. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 3:00 am by John Jenkins
  Here’s an excerpt addressing a recent SPAC-related M&A lawsuit: Consider the 2019 case of Welch v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 8:55 am by Oliver Gayner, Olswang
Particularly in international, cross-border arbitrations, it is commonplace for the parties to pick specific arbitrators because of their nationality and background (with a chairman typically being appointed from a “neutral” background). [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
Such innovation is now necessary: (1) not only because of the volume and complexity of legal literature in each area and the multiple ways of researching it; (2) but also so as to make available to all lawyers such knowledge in aid of preparing competent cross-examinations and arguments with which to challenge the reliability of such frequently used sources of evidence; and, (3) to argue how the rules of procedure that control proceedings concerning, discovery, disclosure, and… [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 6:00 am by Christopher Tyner
There was probable cause to believe that a person whose license was revoked for refusing a chemical analysis after being charged with DWI was operating a vehicle and the procedures of G.S. 20-16.2 do not violate due process Edwards v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 5:03 pm by INFORRM
Cameras appear to have been successfully used in the UK Supreme Court, but of course the concerns of the lower courts do not apply: no juries, witnesses or cross-examinations, as the UKSC’s deputy head of communications pointed out in a comment for PR Week. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 5:52 am by Simon Fodden
McDonald Technology in Litigation: Friend or Foe by Simon V. [read post]
13 Jul 2013, 8:00 am by Raffaela Wakeman
Meanwhile, we learned that the advocacy group Electronic Privacy Information Center filed a petition for a writ of certiorari with the Supreme Court regarding the Verizon FISA order leaked by Edward Snowden. [read post]