Search for: "English v. English"
Results 401 - 420
of 11,160
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Aug 2023, 11:22 am
United Neighborhoods for Los Angeles v. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 10:00 pm
The first is by the afore lauded Professor Rosati, as perfect a scholar as one could find even in her second language of English. [read post]
5 Aug 2023, 3:00 am
His public comment to The History of Public Adjusting—Samuel Milch v. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 9:30 pm
The sale of offices-as-property may seem strange and even corrupt to modern readers, but it was a long-lasting and practical foundation for the nation-state, modern administration, and colonial expansion.Whereas vénalité had grown out of control in revolutionary-era France, the English had a more stable system of freehold property rights, a distinctive English protection of the officeholders’ investment against “despotic” displacement. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 12:37 pm
I am delighted to pass along information about the distribution (July 2023) of "Monitor de la infraestructura china en América Latina y el Caribe 2023" [Monitor of Chinese Infrastructure in Latin America and the Caribbean 2023]. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 8:15 am
Sys. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 4:49 am
The EU Sustainability Directive and Jurisdiction The Draft for a Corporate Sustainable Due Diligence Directive currently contains no rules on jurisdiction. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 4:05 am
"] USA Marble, LLC v. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 2:14 am
On 25 July 2023, the Court of Appeal handed down its decision in Teva & Sandoz v Astellas[1] concerning the validity of Astellas’ patent to mirabegron for use in the treatment of overactive bladder (“OAB”). [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 7:00 am
English: Alexandria, Virginia U.S. [read post]
30 Jul 2023, 3:05 am
Country of origin: new European applications in 2022 v requests for unitary effect On the other hand, proprietors from Asia and the US appear overall less enthusiastic relative to their proportion of European filings. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 6:28 pm
" (Hugh Hall Campbell, KC v. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 8:53 am
Criteria to be applied In contrast to the Chamber, the Grand Chamber considered that the Axel Springer criteria for balancing Articles 8 and 10 (see Axel Springer v Germany [2012] ECHR 227)) were not applicable. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 5:19 am
Drazen v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 6:56 pm
(That "standard" was set by the Supreme Court in Caeteno v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 12:15 pm
To that end I am happy to pass along notice recently made available by the Working Group respecting both the preliminary Program and registration information for the Forum.Conference Information (in English, Spanish and French) along with the 2023 Forum Concept Note follows. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 10:28 am
For an example of these problems, see U.S. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 1:43 am
Or that the credibility of the technical effect is assessed at the priority or filing date (e.g., TGI Paris, October 6, 2009, RG n°07/16446, Teva v. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 8:53 am
Susan V. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 1:41 am
Comment The Court of Appeal noted that it was unfortunate that the trial judge was not referred to Hallen v Brabantia. [read post]
