Search for: "Evans v. Marks"
Results 401 - 420
of 567
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2011, 3:00 am
Bruce Springsteen v. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 4:02 pm
Journalism and the PCC Press Gazette reports that the Guardian has amended a headline about the Mark Duggan shooting but stands by its original story, following a complaint to the PCC by the Metropolitan Police. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 5:13 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 4:10 pm
Wood Herron & Evans (WHE). [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 11:26 am
Might work better if claims were confined to copyright v. patent w/r/t software? [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 1:40 pm
Evan Miller, the petitioner in one of the cases granted on Monday, Miller v. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 3:35 pm
Mark Lemley on Viacom v. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 2:33 am
Thanks are due to the IPKat's friend Marlou L.J. van de Braak (Hoyng Monegier) for telling him all about the General Court's ruling last week in Case T-426/09 Bayerische Asphaltmischwerke v OHIM, Royal BAM, 26 October 2011, on a Community trade mark opposition involving two figurative marks each of which contained the word 'BAM'. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:15 am
See Rowen v. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 6:26 am
Archive Advances Records Management - http://bit.ly/qmA1kC (Evan Koblentz) U.S Cyber Commander Declares Cyber War! [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 4:40 am
http://bit.ly/nWotnF (Jeffrey Klein, Nicolas Pappas) ECPA Protects Non-Citizen Communications Stored in the US – Suzlon Energy v. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 4:40 am
http://bit.ly/nWotnF (Jeffrey Klein, Nicolas Pappas) ECPA Protects Non-Citizen Communications Stored in the US – Suzlon Energy v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 4:59 am
http://bit.ly/nWotnF (Jeffrey Klein, Nicolas Pappas) ECPA Protects Non-Citizen Communications Stored in the US – Suzlon Energy v. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 5:23 am
Our first topic of the week is Florence v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 12:16 pm
See also Evans v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 5:15 am
(Your Secrets Are Safe Here) - http://bit.ly/rgPGAS (Ralph Losey) When You Know, You Know: Cache La Poudre Feeds LLC v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 8:14 pm
” Ignorance Is Bliss In what attorneys for the falsely accused players correctly deem “the City Defendants’ ‘blame Nifong’ approach,” the Durham brief goes to considerable length to suggest that ex-DPD officers Mark Gottlieb and Ben Himan can’t be held liable for their improper behavior—and that any misconduct that occurred resulted from the decision of “State Prosecutor” Mike Nifong. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 12:57 pm
On March 20, the proposed $39 billion deal between AT&T and T-Mobile expires, said a lawyer for AT&T, Mark Hansen of Kellogg, Huber, Hansen, Todd, Evans & Figel. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 12:18 am
In Palomo Sànchez v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 6:08 am
(Part One) – http://tinyurl.com/3p8hbzp (eDiscovery Team) A Timely Warning to Employees About Social Media – http://tinyurl.com/3vjacww (Amanda Bronstad) Baglow v Smith – The Increasing Importance of Context in Defamation Claims - http://tinyurl.com/44pmecq (Bob Tarantino) Connecticut Courts Weigh In on Social Media as Evidence – http://tinyurl.com/3hgy34v (Marie Grady) D.C. [read post]
