Search for: "FRAME v FRAME"
Results 401 - 420
of 8,269
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2022, 6:18 am
Patent No. 8,311,031 on a "cell search method, forward link frame transmission method, apparatus using the same and forward link frame structure"U.S. [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 7:08 pm
, and for me it is purely an academic issue which should be framed thusly: “Whether format-shifting music (such as ripping a CD to your iPod) by a consumer for personal use or as a backup is a fair use under the Copyright Act. [read post]
21 Apr 2024, 8:07 am
AI Visualize, Inc. v. [read post]
3 May 2013, 9:22 am
., et al. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 11:03 am
A good new example is Berg v. [read post]
13 May 2009, 3:40 am
Let's see if that legal sheepskin on your wall was worth the cost of framing it. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 8:54 am
The Amdocs v. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 6:37 am
Lewis v. [read post]
14 May 2023, 8:27 am
Last Term, the Court, in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
14 May 2023, 8:27 am
Last Term, the Court, in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 11:22 am
Shared Memory Graphics, LLC v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 7:02 am
In Birch v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 7:02 am
In Birch v. [read post]
30 Oct 2010, 11:15 am
Melendez v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 5:49 am
The Act, however, contains numerous periods of delay which are not counted when computing the 70 day time frame. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 1:57 am
The case is titled Major Textile Imports, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 3:41 pm
Today's ruling in Latif v. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 3:05 am
Peter Thiel match-up [Jacob Gershman, WSJ] “Prosecutors Investigate Firms That Offer Plaintiffs Early Cash” [Matthew Goldstein and Jessica Silver-Greenberg, New York Times] Seventh Circuit: parents, not Starbucks, bore duty of protecting 3-year-old from harm resulting from playing on crowd-control stanchions [Roh v. [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 1:01 pm
Some of the concerns raised were that, in theory, such an ordinance could conflict with the state Building Code and increase construction costs by limiting the use of Type V construction. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 7:43 am
In May 2007, the Court ruled in Ledbetter v. [read post]
