Search for: "FRENCH v. CALIFORNIA"
Results 401 - 420
of 577
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2011, 7:42 am
Metromail Cy Pres Fund, The Supnick, et al. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 7:42 am
Metromail Cy Pres Fund, The Supnick, et al. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:00 am
Oveissi v. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 5:01 am
Instead, they need to examine what other states have done, to learn, for example, from California officials whether the California approach worked out, to invite businesses to offer their proposals, to start examining tax returns and other records to identify taxpayers most likely to be deficient in use tax payments in amounts making audit and collection procedures worth the effort, and to publicize these efforts in an attempt to educate other residents of their use tax… [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 4:18 am
Hise (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) Supreme Court confirms that a download is not a performance: ASCAP v United States (1709 Copyright Blog) (Ars Technica) District Court S D New York: Court nukes another mass defendant file-sharing lawsuit: Digiprotect v Does (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) District Court E D Virginia calls out copyright trolls’ coercive business model, threaten sanctions K-Beech v Does 1–85 (EFF) (Ars Technica) District Court… [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 3:00 am
Co. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 4:29 am
– sound recording copyright royalties and cinematographic works (IP Osgoode) Century 21 v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 4:18 pm
In a legal dispute (Aurora S.A. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 2:03 pm
Mavrix Photo v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 5:41 am
Justice Scalia, writing for the majority, agreed that the unconscionably finding under California law was preempted by the FAA. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 3:16 pm
” As discussed in Kwikset v. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 11:24 pm
Democratic Underground (Electronic Frontier Foundation) District Court N D California: 17 USC 512(f) preempts state law claims over bogus copyright takedown notices: Amaretto v. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 8:39 am
District Court for the Northern District of California dismissed the plaintiffs’ first suit in October 2010, accepting the airline’s forum non conveniens argument that France was the natural jurisdiction for cases arising from the crash of Flight 447, given that most of the defendants were French. [...] [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 8:39 am
District Court for the Northern District of California dismissed the plaintiffs’ first suit in October 2010, accepting the airline’s forum non conveniens argument that France was the natural jurisdiction for cases arising from the crash of Flight 447, given that most of the defendants were French. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 1:35 pm
V. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 12:38 pm
Following the Morrison v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 2:04 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 7:01 am
Otes, a wealthy land owner charged all debts owed to him to be paid in French, rather than local currency. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
Smith, Kline & French Laboratories, 447 So.2d 1301, 1305 (Ala. 1984).AlaskaShanks v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 10:58 pm
ePlus v. [read post]
