Search for: "Feldman v. State" Results 401 - 420 of 848
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2016, 7:10 am by Amy Howe
  They issued just one opinion in an argued case: United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
26 May 2016, 4:01 am by Amy Howe
In the ABA Journal, Mark Walsh analyzes the Court’s recent decision in Luis v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 4:06 am by Amy Howe
  And at Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman describes the database that he created of Garland’s opinions. [read post]
9 May 2016, 4:11 am by Amy Howe
In The Washington Post, Mark Berman reports on the aftermath of the Court’s recent decision in Hurst v. [read post]
2 May 2016, 2:37 am by Amy Howe
In The Economist, Steven Mazie looks back at last week’s decision in Heffernan v. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 3:37 am by Amy Howe
” At Medium, David Leopold considers what a four-four tie in United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 2:56 am by Amy Howe
Commentary on United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2016, 10:11 am by Simon Lester
Similarly, in Marvin Feldman v Mexico, the United States submitted a view that benefitted the claimant’s claim that under NAFTA 1117(1), the NAFTA did not bar a claim against Mexico under Chapter 11 by a natural person who was both a citizen of the United States and a permanent resident of Mexico (Marvin Roy Feldman v United Mexican States, Submission of the United States of America on Preliminary Issues (ICSID Case No,… [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 7:57 am by Amy Howe
Monday’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 3:27 am by Amy Howe
Yesterday the Court heard oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 2:50 am by Amy Howe
Today the Court will hear oral arguments in just one case:  United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 6:41 am by Amy Howe
Earlier this week, both sides filed supplemental briefs in Zubik v. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 6:13 am by Amy Howe
  Lyle Denniston covered the request in Friedrichs v. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 5:09 am by Amy Howe
More commentary on Monday’s ruling in Evenwel v. [read post]