Search for: "Fictitious Defendant #1" Results 401 - 420 of 609
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2012, 6:03 pm by Jordan D. Maglich
Approximately $232 million was paid to investors in the form of fictitious interest payments. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 5:24 pm by Jordan D. Maglich
"  In invoking these exceptions, the US points to several factors, including (1) the estimate that over 21,000 investors lost money in Stanford's scheme, (2) complications involved in calculating loss amounts when over $1 billion in fictitious interest was paid to investors and the fact that some investors withdrew portions of their principal while some kept all funds with Stanford, and (3) the likely duplication of efforts already underway by the SEC… [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 5:39 am by Travis Crabtree
But, The Fireworks Restoration Company had difficulty proving it was damaged by the negative review resulting in a $1 award from the jury for lost profits. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 5:39 am by Travis Crabtree
But, The Fireworks Restoration Company had difficulty proving it was damaged by the negative review resulting in a $1 award from the jury for lost profits. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 11:04 am by Thomas G. Heintzman
  Shaw alleged that the defendants had used fictitious names and addresses to subscribe for satellite delivery of TV programs and had then re-broadcast the programs to tenants of the apartment buildings. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 10:59 am by Thomas Heintzman
  Shaw alleged that the defendants had used fictitious names and addresses to subscribe for satellite delivery of TV programs and had then re-broadcast the programs to tenants of the apartment buildings. [read post]
2 Jun 2012, 12:12 pm by Abhik Majumdar
Apart from the ISPs mentioned, it specifies five other parties all denoted by the fictitious name "Ashok Kumar", and then also "other unknown persons", against whom the injunction applies. [read post]
21 May 2012, 7:37 am
Using a fictitious name, the defendant first attempted to enter to the U.S in 1995, she had claimed to be born in Texas but she was returned to Mexico when immigration officers discovered she was not the person she claimed. [read post]
16 May 2012, 5:47 pm by Mandelman
  And attorneys in the mix would mean the threat of litigation, which would be both costly and time consuming for banks to defend. [read post]
16 May 2012, 5:47 pm by Mandelman
  And attorneys in the mix would mean the threat of litigation, which would be both costly and time consuming for banks to defend. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 10:37 pm by Michael Kline
 The analysis utilized in Installment 75 for the Schedule 1 Foundations should be considered for the Defendant Foundations as well. [read post]