Search for: "Floyd v. State" Results 401 - 420 of 840
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Mar 2017, 9:15 am by Josh H. Escovedo
In issuing its ruling and permitting AVELA’s attempt to cancel the MARILYN MONROE trademark on the ground that it is generic, Judge Failla stated “To be clear, the court harbors serious doubts that V. [read post]
25 Feb 2017, 12:09 pm by Michael Rosenblat
Under this theory which the Supreme Court addressed in Universal Health Service v. [read post]
25 Feb 2017, 12:09 pm by Michael Rosenblat
Under this theory which the Supreme Court addressed in Universal Health Service v. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 4:00 pm by otmseo
Under this theory which the Supreme Court addressed in Universal Health Service v. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 4:06 am by SHG
And the state has retained the Godfather of Free Speech, Floyd Abrams, to fight its cause. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 1:30 pm by Jessica Smith
In addition to reversing the lower court, Floyd also effectively overrules State v. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 1:30 pm by Jessica Smith
In addition to reversing the lower court, Floyd also effectively overrules State v. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 12:48 am
  The authority cited in support of this proposition is Pozzoli SPA v BDMO [2007] EWCA Civ 588, in which Jacob LJ stated at para 10: "I would add this about permission to appeal in patent cases generally. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 8:28 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Illegal sentence — Exceeds plea agreement In 2002, William Campbell, appellant, pursuant to a plea agreement, pleaded guilty in the Circuit Court for Washington County to four counts of armed robbery and one count of use of a handgun in the commission of a crime of violence. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 7:03 am
  Analysing the five principles put forward by Floyd J in Ratiopharm v Napp Pharmaceutical Holdings Ltd [2008] EWHC 3070 (Pat) (see paras 154-159), Johnny observed that the days of simply pleading "obviousness over the CGK" are long gone - you must now assert what it is that you specifically allege is CGK. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 11:58 pm
 Paragraph [0003] of the Patent states that the invention is directed to chronic pain disorders. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 12:00 am
  Although practice guidance states that the Patents Court endeavours to bring patent cases on for trial where possible within 12 months of the claim being issued, the appeal stage alone can take 18 months + given the current backlog of cases. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 12:44 am by John Collins
The judge held that the “undue burden” concept in English law (particularly as outlined by Arnold J in Eli Lilly v Janssen in 2014) was not particularly helpful under Australian law. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 3:36 pm
 Mr Justice Arnold is on a bit of a winning streak it seems, as last week in Idenix v Gilead [2016] EWCA 1089 the Court of Appeal consisting of Lord Justices Kitchin (giving the lead judgment), Floyd and Patten upheld his decision back in December 2014 (see Kat Darren's post here). [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 2:35 am
 Moreover, this is really where it starts to get interesting.In the Court of Appeal decision relating to interim relief before the main trial before Arnold J, Floyd LJ had examined the proper interpretation of Swiss-form, second medical use claims (the present judgment states that this was at the behest of the parties: "The court was invited by both parties at that stage to decide the issue of law so that the parties knew where they stood for the purposes of the… [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 7:10 am
  One way of putting this is whether the skilled person “would”, rather than “could”, arrive at the claimed invention without inventive effort (mirroring the EPO test of T2/83), but Lord Justice Floyd (delivering the Court of Appeal decision with which Lord Justice Kitchin and Lord Justice David Richards agreed) stated that this dichotomy can be misleading, as it may bring in non-technical considerations that are not relevant.Furthermore,… [read post]