Search for: "Flurry v. State" Results 401 - 420 of 530
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jul 2011, 7:34 pm by Gideon
After a flurry of decisions in the 1960s and 70s (Stanley v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 11:22 am by Orin Kerr
A flurry of concurring opinions followed. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 8:46 am by Nabiha Syed
” And finally, in United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 11:16 am by Donna Eng
McNeil, 08-14402-CIV-JEM, concluding that Florida’s death penalty procedure violates the United States Supreme Court case of Ring v. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 6:06 pm
But prior to the tides of torrential rains gracing London's streets, the US Supreme Court issued a flurry of IP decisions - including last week's i4i case (see AmeriKat report here). [read post]
20 May 2011, 9:21 am by Bill Raftery
History suggests the former, but in light of the flurry of anti-merit activity this year, it is hard to tell what end is what in the realm of judicial selection. [read post]
10 May 2011, 10:11 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Readers of this blog may recall that in September 2010, Judge Victor Marrero entered a significant ruling in the case, in which he granted the defendants’ motion, in reliance on the Morrison v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 1:30 pm by Jeralyn
The United States District Court for the District of Colorado recently reaffirmed this fundamental principle of our federal constitutional system in United States v, Bartkowicz, No. 10-cr-00118-PAB (D. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 6:06 am by Nabiha Syed
Yesterday the Court heard oral argument in Microsoft v. i4i Limited Partnership, which parses the standard by which companies accused of infringement must prove that the patent is invalid, eliciting a flurry of day-after commentary. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 6:38 pm by Rick Hills
In this respect, presidential signing statements are a species of that genre of constitutional avoidance familiar from judicial opinions like Gregory v. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 11:44 am by emp
Last week saw a flurry of reports about the case of R. v. [read post]