Search for: "Friedman v. United States" Results 401 - 420 of 602
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Apr 2019, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
  If the Supreme Court is an elite largely influenced by elites, the United States is not a democracy in the classical Aristotelean sense, but a mixed regime where aristocrats and plebes both participate in governance. [read post]
28 Mar 2020, 1:38 pm by Larry
" The United States moved to dismiss this action on the grounds that TRI could have filed a protests challenging the origin determination and then filed an (a) case if CBP denied the protest. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 2:07 pm by Larry
United States et al., a decision of the U.S. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 5:29 pm by Lloyd J. Jassin
  By way of background, the publisher filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on December 23, 2011, against eBook publisher, Open Road Integrated Media. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 6:40 am
Barnette, 319 U.S. 624 (1943), (ENCYCLOPEDIA OF THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, David Spinoza Tanenhaus, ed., Gale, 2008).Amelia J. [read post]
24 Dec 2012, 2:00 am by Peter Mahler
The trial court disagreed with the hearing officer’s reasoning, finding that it was contrary to binding precedent established in Friedman v. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 6:02 pm by Larry
United States, a recent decision of the U.S. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 5:16 am by Aaron Tang
Richard Friedman – I certainly agree with Joelle that Bryant introduced unnecessary confusion. [read post]
2 Sep 2006, 9:53 pm
Rev. 1687), A Tale of Two Nations: Implementation of the Death Penalty in "Executing" Versus "Symbolic" States in the United States, by Carol S. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 8:01 am by Nabiha Syed
Briefly: At Dorf on Law, Mike Dorf focuses on another of last Thursday’s decisions:  United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 4:40 am by Rebecca Tushnet
”  The analysis concluded with a big quote from Friedman v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 7:32 am by Allison Trzop
  Anticipating what a victory for same-sex advocates could mean in United States v. [read post]