Search for: "G. G. v. State"
Results 401 - 420
of 11,902
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Sep 2023, 6:56 am
As stated by the ASIC chair, “… greenhushing is… just another form of greenwashing, and risks misleading by omission. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 11:19 am
” Arizona v. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 9:24 am
Further, the website’s FAQ section states that compliance with regulatory requirements concerning marking of disposable drinks packaging necessitates displaying the earlier sign on beverage packaging. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 8:00 am
State v. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 6:05 am
From Khan v. [read post]
23 Sep 2023, 7:21 pm
State laboratories can send STEC cultures to the CDC to determine the serotype. [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 9:30 pm
Paul Lombardo, Georgia State University, on Buck v. [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
"FOIL imposes a broad duty on government agencies to make their records available to the public" citing Matter of Madeiros v New York State Educ. [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
"FOIL imposes a broad duty on government agencies to make their records available to the public" citing Matter of Madeiros v New York State Educ. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:20 am
COVID-19 Pandemic Issues The Honorable Susan V. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 10:30 pm
And finally, in the most recent C-204/21 Commission v Poland, the Court asserted its authority in the strongest possible terms by proclaiming that, “the review of Member States’ compliance with the requirements arising from Article 2[…] TEU falls fully within the jurisdiction of the Court” (para. 62), and that Article 2 TEU is not merely a statement of policy guidelines or intentions, but rather “contains values which are an integral part of the… [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 7:42 am
[I will blog the NetChoice v. [read post]
16 Sep 2023, 6:44 am
(v) Counsel fees and costs. 23 Pa.C.S. 5323(g) Assuming the judge thought this was contempt-worthy let’s review those remedies. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 6:47 pm
Not all such congratulations are "G+s". [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 10:57 am
The BIA determined that Avila’s PSG did not “exist independently” of the harm alleged, as required under Matter of M-E-V-G-113 and Matter of W-G-R-. 114 Matter of M-E-V-G- cites to this Court’s prior precedent in Lukwago v. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 6:51 am
The propaganda strategy is not meant for the state apparatus of competitor states. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 11:46 am
”Stephen G., attorney “I use your site with my students and it is invaluable. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 1:06 pm
The defendant relied on State v. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 4:37 am
Earlier this year, using as a springboard the Maryland intermediate appellate court’s decision in Eastland Food Corp. v Mekhaya, I posted about a topic on which there’s little or no New York law, viz., whether a complaint for minority shareholder oppression stated a valid claim centered on allegations that the directors/majority shareholders, instead of declaring profit distributions for all shareholders, were taking disguised distributions in the form of excessive… [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 9:30 pm
John G. [read post]
