Search for: "GRANT et al v. HOLDER et al"
Results 401 - 420
of 463
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2024, 10:44 am
But Park et al. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 4:42 am
jovický Budvar, národní podnik v Anheuser-Busch, Inc. [read post]
5 Jan 2014, 3:30 pm
Supreme Court (assuming of course that certiorari is granted). [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
Government is not a party to this defamation lawsuit—Victor Restis et al. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 1:32 am
In 2001, the case of Golan et al v Holder was brought by a collection of plaintiffs, including orchestra conductors, educators, performers, motion picture distributors and publishers against the United States government alleging that Section 514 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act (URAA)- section 104A and 109 of the Copyright Act - is unconstitutional. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 4:59 am
Barclays Bank PLC, et al., 16-239. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 8:01 am
Breibart News Network, LLC et. al. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 8:01 am
Breibart News Network, LLC et. al. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 8:01 am
Breibart News Network, LLC et. al. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 8:01 am
Breibart News Network, LLC et. al. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 4:46 pm
Kappos et al., Case No. 2010-1534, perhaps starting (or ending) another chapter in the saga over a Patent Term Extension (“PTE”) for U.S. [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 12:11 pm
Holder, 132 S. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 10:58 am
These included efforts by the proposed user to obtain authorization from the rights holder within a reasonable period of time – a requirement that may be waived by a WTO member during national emergencies or other circumstances of extreme urgency, which were undefined. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 11:39 pm
See Dulong v. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 11:36 am
The Prime Minister of Canada et al., Federal Court Judge James W. [read post]
15 Sep 2021, 1:07 am
., HTC Corporation et al. vs IPCom GmbH & Co. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
: (Patent Docs), US: Supreme Court declines to hear final Nucleonics’ appeal in gene-silencing patent dispute with Benitec Australia: (IP Law360), (Therapeutics Daily), US: 505(b)(2) drug approvals rock - Interaction of patents and exclusivity of drugs approved by FDA under section 505(b)(2): (Patent Baristas), US: StemCells’ patents survive reexam – StemCells and Neuralstem differ on extent of changes: (Patent Docs), US: StemCells announces issuance of… [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 6:30 am
Its proceedings would necessarily be ex parte and in secret, and, like a FISA court, I suspect almost all of the government’s applications would be granted, because, like a FISA application, the government would be sure to present a compelling case. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 9:04 pm
As the Supreme Court put it in a 1984 decision (Bob Jones University v. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 11:29 am
Thus, for instance, Cao, et al., Willingness to Shoot: Public Attitudes Toward Defensive Gun Use, 27 Am. [read post]
