Search for: "GRANT v. UNITED STATES POST OFFICE et al"
Results 401 - 420
of 575
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2011, 12:37 pm
The Administration bears the responsibility to grant leases and permits for exploration and production to begin. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 8:13 am
Title: Al-Odah v. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 11:12 pm
AT&T, Inc., et. al. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 12:53 pm
Lenge et al. in oppositionBrief of respondents Audrey Blondin et al. in oppositionPetitioners' reply Note: Goldstein, Howe & Russell, P.C. serves as counsel to the petitioners in the following case, which is listed without regard to its likelihood of being granted.Title: Council Tree Investors, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 3:42 am
The Walt Disney Company, et. al. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 1:26 pm
Harvey et al.Amicus brief of Gerald Sherwin et al.Petitioner's reply Title: Evanson v. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 3:10 am
(Hint: No) (Public Knowledge) US Patent Reform Phelps on patent reform, the mobile wars and RPX, among other things (IAM) US Patents – Decisions District Court E D Missouri: Bilski invalidates patent claims for computerized system for tracking insurance policies: Bancorp v Sun Life (Docket Report) District Court C D California: Web commerce claims incorporating ‘integrated database management’ element are not invalid under Bilski: Big Baboon v Dell (Docket Report)… [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 2:00 am
ADA, Inc., et al., No. 4:01-CV-79 (E.D. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 5:56 pm
The Commission generally does not grant extensions that would exceed 90 days from the original due date. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 2:58 am
(Patents Post Grant Blog) US Patents – Decisions CAFC panel disagrees on proper role of specification in claim construction: Arlington v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 3:19 am
Morris, PBS, et al. [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 8:25 pm
Dickinson Wright and John Artz (Patently-O) (PharmaPatents) BPAI: Removing terminal disclaimers by patent reissue: Ex parte Shunpei Yamazaki (Patents Post Grant Blog) District Court N D Ohio: Equitable intervening rights: Bendix Commercial Vehicle Systems LLC, et al v. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 10:07 am
Chamber of Commerce et al. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 3:20 am
(Chicago IP Litigation Blog) N D Ohio: Damages award exceeding stipulated 4% royalty rate was not excessive: Bendix Commercial Vehicle Systems LLC, et. al. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 6:44 am
These are petitions raising issues that Tom has determined to have a reasonable chance of being granted, although we post them here without consideration of whether they present appropriate vehicles in which to decide those issues Title: Maxwell-Jolly v. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 7:31 pm
(IPBiz) Apple – Apple’s US application 20100332283: Social networking in shopping environments (IPBiz) Interval – Paul Allen’s Interval Licensing refiles suit, accuses Android of patent infringement: Interval Licensing v AOL et al (FOSS Patents) (ArsTechnica) (Techdirt) Microsoft – Microsoft files new 337 complaint regarding Certain Game Devices (ITC Law Blog) (ITC 337 Update) Microsoft – Microsoft pursues i4i patent reexamination… [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 9:38 pm
Highlights this week included: Spain rejects ‘US influenced’ copyright bill (1709 Copyright Blog) (EFF) (Ars Technica) (TorrentFreak) Tessera wins at CAFC – eBay factors irrelevant to ITC exclusion orders: Spansion et al v ITC, Tessera (IPBiz) (Patents Post-Grant) (ITC 337 Update) Please join the discussion by adding your comments on any of these stories, and please do let us know if you think we’ve missed something important, or… [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 10:22 pm
Abstract: This essay reads the public controversy surrounding Sonja Sotomayor’s nomination and confirmation to Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 8:08 am
NICOLA PENGUE, ET AL., App. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 3:34 am
Blizzard (Electronic Frontier Foundation) (Patent Arcade) (WIRED) (Ars Technica) US – IV files patent suits against nine companies – Intellectual Ventures v Altera et al; Intellectual Ventures v Check Point Software et al; Intellectual Ventures v Hynix et al(Patently-O) (IAM) (IAM) (IPBiz) (271 Patent Blog) (PatLit) Please join the discussion by adding your comments on any of these stories, and please… [read post]
