Search for: "GRIFFITHS v. STATE"
Results 401 - 420
of 541
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2011, 8:48 pm
(For example the car you bought blew up or the bags of rice you purchased are filled with rat droppings) Griffith v. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 9:15 am
Griffiths. [read post]
7 Mar 2021, 4:34 pm
On the same day there was a statement in open court [pdf] in the case of Sadler v Joyner read before Griffiths J. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 9:04 am
Griffith and Brett M. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 10:37 am
See Griffith v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 3:00 am
Co., 653 N.W.2d 323, 331 (Iowa 2002) (stating injury “must be related to the working environment or the conditions of employment”); Griffith v. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 5:52 pm
On Wednesday 27 June 2012, a three judge Divisional Court, the Lord Chief Justice, Owen and Griffiths Williams JJ heard the “Twitter joke” case, Chambers v DPP. [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 8:47 am
Also, s.97(2), CA 1989 makes it a criminal offence for anyone to publish any material which is likely to identify any child as being involved in proceedings in which any power under the Children Act 1989 or the Adoption and Children Act 2002 may be exercised with respect to that or any other child, or their address or school, unless the court has made an order disapplying the effect of s.97(2), as to which jurisdiction see Griffiths v Tickle [2021] EWCA Civ 1882; [2022] EMLR 11. [read post]
20 Jun 2022, 3:23 pm
Circuit, about which the NYT writes: At least two climate cases are pending before the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 7:36 pm
On the other hand, in 2003 in R. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2009, 1:19 pm
There are archetypal characters: the jock brother who makes gay jokes, the sinister psychiatrist, the judgmental minister from the Griffith’s church, and the sympathetic gay man with whom Bobby shares a drink at a dance club. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:46 am
Sidemans and Company Nigeria Limited v Calag Capital Limited (Afro-IP) Poland Personal circumstances in trade mark registration (Class 46) South Africa FIFA v Metcash trade mark case - Owen Dean's response (Afro-IP) South Africa 1 - Ambush Marketers 0: legal framework to help FIFA and 2010 World Cup sponsors protect their rights (Managing IP) Switzerland New developments in Swiss patent law (IP Frontline) Federal Administrative Court finds PARK AVENUE not descriptive for… [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:46 am
Sidemans and Company Nigeria Limited v Calag Capital Limited (Afro-IP) Poland Personal circumstances in trade mark registration (Class 46) South Africa FIFA v Metcash trade mark case - Owen Dean's response (Afro-IP) South Africa 1 - Ambush Marketers 0: legal framework to help FIFA and 2010 World Cup sponsors protect their rights (Managing IP) Switzerland New developments in Swiss patent law (IP Frontline) Federal Administrative Court finds PARK AVENUE not descriptive for… [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 5:46 am
Sidemans and Company Nigeria Limited v Calag Capital Limited (Afro-IP) Poland Personal circumstances in trade mark registration (Class 46) South Africa FIFA v Metcash trade mark case – Owen Dean’s response (Afro-IP) South Africa 1 – Ambush Marketers 0: legal framework to help FIFA and 2010 World Cup sponsors protect their rights (Managing IP) Switzerland New developments in Swiss patent law (IP Frontline) Federal… [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 4:07 pm
Should Australia have a specialist “freedom of speech” appellate court at Federal level, as is the case the United States? [read post]
18 Dec 2007, 7:42 am
Box 48314 Olympia, WA 98504-8314 Phone: (360) 586-3558; (800) 634-4473 (V/TTY/Toll Free) Web: www.wa.gov/ddc Helping Hands for the Disabled P.O. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:47 pm
(See Griffith v. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 9:54 am
The Cordray appointment is under constitutional challenge in a separate case in federal district court in Washington (State National Bank of Big Spring v. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 11:41 am
Griffith and joined by Senior Judge Stephen F. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 8:18 am
In Kentucky State Bd. of Licensure for Professional Engineers and Land Surveyors v. [read post]
