Search for: "Garcia v. Does"
Results 401 - 420
of 896
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jun 2008, 2:31 pm
Garcia, 890 F.2d 355, 360 (11th Cir. 1989). [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 3:51 am
The marks were invalidated almost a year ago by the Appeal Board, after they saw that the marks were disparaging to Native Americans under section 2(a) of the Lanham Act.* Were the condoms "made in Germany" and why does it matter? [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 9:33 am
Never Too Late 67 [week ending on Sunday 11 October] – Eponia rumours | Batmobile and copyright | EPO and human rights | Gucci v Guess | NOCN (Formerly National Open College Network) v Open College Network Credit4Learning | New CJEU reference on linking and copyright | Viennese waltz may be the last dance for Board members | Richard Perry v F H Brundle & Others | Safe harbour and the Schrems case |… [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 7:43 am
Garcia, 176 Ariz. 231, 236, 860 P.2d 498, 503 (Arizona Court of Appeals 1993). [read post]
10 Aug 2018, 12:19 pm
Bridgeport v. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 11:52 am
Rees, No. 07-5439 Kentucky's lethal injection protocol used as its method of execution does not violate the Eighth Amendment's ban on cruel and unusual punishments. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 3:03 pm
GARCIA, et al., Intervenor Defendants. 11th Circuit. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 11:41 am
The decision below is State v. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 8:58 am
In People v. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 1:19 pm
Wrogeman v. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 11:45 am
U.S. 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals, February 20, 2009 Ponta-Garcia v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 4:50 am
Garcia-Ruiz, 2010 U.S. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 6:02 am
United States, 10-8659, Garcia v. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 3:28 am
Does 1–426, supra. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 11:03 am
That decision is First Solar, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 2:59 pm
Cordero-Garcia (consolidated for one hour of oral argument on April 17): Whether a criminal offense that does not interfere with an existing investigation or judicial proceeding qualifies as an “offense relating to obstruction of justice,” a serious crime that can result in deportation and additional criminal punishment for noncitizens. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:08 pm
" In light of the foregoing, and given that no contrary medical opinions were presented, the Board's factual determination that claimant suffered from an occupational disease resulting from repetitive stress is supported by substantial evidence and will not be disturbed (see Matter of Garcia v MCI Interiors, Inc., 158 AD3d 907, 908 [2018]; Matter of Curtis v Xerox, 66 AD3d 1106, 1108 [2009]). [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:08 pm
" In light of the foregoing, and given that no contrary medical opinions were presented, the Board's factual determination that claimant suffered from an occupational disease resulting from repetitive stress is supported by substantial evidence and will not be disturbed (see Matter of Garcia v MCI Interiors, Inc., 158 AD3d 907, 908 [2018]; Matter of Curtis v Xerox, 66 AD3d 1106, 1108 [2009]). [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 11:45 am
The Bush v. [read post]
26 Jan 2007, 12:27 am
Ferrer KINGS COUNTYWorkers' CompensationWCL §11 Does Not Shield Employer From Third- Party Liability When It Fails to Secure Insurance Garcia v. [read post]
