Search for: "General Corporation v. General Motors Corporation" Results 401 - 420 of 863
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2014, 5:00 am by Robin Alexander
 Russo is a director of Alcoa, Inc., General Motors Company and Merck & Co. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Class 46)   India Chennai IP Appellate Board: Well-known trademarks - consumer recollection is key: Societe des Produits Nestle SA v Jai ram (International Law Office) Bombay High Court rules on the infringement of copyright in drawings: Indiana Gratings Private Limited & Anr v Anand Udyog Fabricators Private Limited & Ors (Spicy IP) Is ‘science’ essential for creating patent lawyers: some ‘general’ thoughts… [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Class 46)   India Chennai IP Appellate Board: Well-known trademarks - consumer recollection is key: Societe des Produits Nestle SA v Jai ram (International Law Office) Bombay High Court rules on the infringement of copyright in drawings: Indiana Gratings Private Limited & Anr v Anand Udyog Fabricators Private Limited & Ors (Spicy IP) Is ‘science’ essential for creating patent lawyers: some ‘general’ thoughts… [read post]
13 May 2017, 11:48 am by Jonathan H. Adler
(You know, General Motors importing parts from around the world, to be incorporated into vehicles manufactured in this country.) [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 3:40 am by Peter Mahler
Five years after Kemp, in a case called Ingle v Glamore Motor Sales, Inc., the same court rejected a minority shareholder’s contention that his status as such exempted him from the at-will employment doctrine and allowed him to seek a remedy for wrongful termination of his employment. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Actavis Group PTC EHF & Ors v ICOS Corporation & Anor, heard 19-20 Nov 2018. [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 6:28 am
Of course, the globeandmail treated a different licensor, NTP, quite differently in reporting the NTP v. [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 12:30 pm by Steve Bainbridge
The Delaware General Corporation Law is, for the most part, enabling in nature. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 1:25 pm
  However, Hill went beyond Dumas and, even assuming that a lost chance claim could exist generally, refused to apply it to product liability cases:[T]he lost chance doctrine, even when recognized, has been limited to medical malpractice cases. [read post]