Search for: "George v. Davis" Results 401 - 420 of 502
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2014, 6:55 am by Yishai Schwartz
And in my last week as the lawfare intern, I attended oral arguments in Ralls Corporation v. [read post]
20 May 2016, 6:45 am
McLaughlin and Yafit Cohn, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP, on Friday, May 13, 2016 Tags: Acquisition agreements, Contracts, Corporate fraud, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Due diligence, Fair values,Fairness review, Liability standards, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions, Reliance Genuine Parts Co. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2020, 9:06 pm by Series of Essays
Glicksman, The George Washington University Law School and Alejandro E. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:44 am by admin
  One such example is the third edition’s treatment of confidence intervals.[1] The “DNA Identification” chapter noted that the meaning of a confidence interval is subtle,[2] but I doubt that the authors, David Kaye and George Sensabaugh, actually found it subtle or difficult. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 7:12 am by Jay Pinho
On September 18, Gorsuch spoke at the George W. [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 1:00 pm by Steve Lubet
Davis, PhD Professor of Biochemistry and Genetics Stanford University Stanford, California Jonathan C.W. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 5:58 am by madeo-design
Her judicial service began in 1992 when President George H.W. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 3:53 pm by Mark Walsh
He cites “a justice who served as an Arizona state legislator” and quotes from Sandra Day O’Connor’s opinion in Davis v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am by Guest Author
This paper is much narrower—Sunstein is really unpacking some of the conservative SCOTUS bloc’s internal debates about the MQD in Biden v. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 10:25 am by Neil H. Buchanan
  For example, I recall watching a Republican presidential non-debate two decades in which George W. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  If this seems too bleak a view of the Court, consider that this is exactly what the Court did in Vega v. [read post]