Search for: "Gibson, in Re"
Results 401 - 420
of 1,153
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Mar 2015, 7:00 am
Merpel also wants to know: does it matter what your domain name is any more, now that most of us don't use them to find the site we're looking for? [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 9:30 pm
Sorry that we're a bit late on this one, but better later than never! [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 8:50 am
And we’re not done yet. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 1:44 am
Here comes the 33rd weekly round-up of last week's Katposts, recorded by the sensitive pen of Katfriend par excellence Alberto Bellan, who writes as follows:* When friendship is re-interpreted: Italy and San Marino take new view on IP rights Italy and San Marino's treaty on IP recognition seems to be over. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 9:58 am
Gibson: you don’t have to reject the contract theory to reject it in TM. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 8:49 am
Trade dress: Congress relegated it to the Supplemental Register; In re Haig & Haig (Comm’r 1958) Daphne Robert said that she didn’t care what Congress said; 8th Circuit said it was protectable under §43(a) for trade dress of corn hopper. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 5:25 am
What else to code re: authors as parties; our definitions included WFH. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 6:00 am
Dickey, partner and Co-Chair of the National Securities Litigation Practice Group at Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, and is based on a Gibson Dunn publication. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 2:56 pm
Law Center) Jim Gibson (Univ. of Richmond School of Law) Eric Goldman (Santa Clara Univ. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 6:39 am
The interesting stuff, to me, lies in the rhetorical space between “copy and you’re a thief” notices and “copy and you’re a hero” notices. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 3:21 am
And don’t forget our new “Proxy Advisors Handbook”… Corp Fin’s No-Action Relief: 5-Business Day Debt Tender Offers Allowed On Friday, Corp Fin’s Office of Mergers & Acquisitions issued a no-action response as fleshed out by this Gibson Dunn blog by Jim Moloney & Andrew Fabens (we’re posting memos about this in DealLawyers.com’s “Tender Offers” Practice Area): Today, January 23, 2015, the Division of Corporation… [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 3:05 am
On Friday, Corp Fin’s Office of Mergers & Acquisitions issued a no-action response as fleshed out by this Gibson Dunn blog by Jim Moloney & Andrew Fabens (we’re posting memos about this in our “Tender Offers” Practice Area): Today, January 23, 2015, the Division of Corporation Finance (the “Staff”) granted a no-action letter that was […] [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 3:52 am
Can Companies with Counterproposals Just Exclude Them & See If They’re Sued By the Proponent? [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 4:12 pm
Drivers of commercial vehicles have a higher duty of care than regular motorists, because they’re able to cause more damage with their vehicles, and are being entrusted with the lives of those they’re transporting. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 5:57 am
Gibson (@UGAJack) January 7, 2015 What about you? [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 5:57 am
Gibson (@UGAJack) January 7, 2015 What about you? [read post]
1 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm
Moeser’s letter reassures deans that NCBE has “reviewed and re-reviewed” every “aspect of [its] methodology and execution[,]” and that the July 2014 test has been examined multiple times and by different, independent psychometricians to guarantee that it was no more difficult than the 2013 test or previous tests. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 4:39 am
Among the “debaters,” Debra Wong Jang, a partner at Gibson Dunn and former U.S. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 6:27 pm
Gibson(2009) 178 Cal.App.4th 318, 324-325 [100 Cal.Rptr.3d 335].)[2] Discussion The probate court’s reliance upon Civil Code section 1624, subdivision (a)(7), is misplaced. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 6:27 pm
Gibson(2009) 178 Cal.App.4th 318, 324-325 [100 Cal.Rptr.3d 335].)[2] Discussion The probate court’s reliance upon Civil Code section 1624, subdivision (a)(7), is misplaced. [read post]
