Search for: "Goodwin v. Goodwin" Results 401 - 420 of 726
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2019, 5:23 pm by Public Employment Law Press
"To the extent that Plaintiff did not establish actual notice because she did not specify that her description of the assault included a recitation of who was in the room, the Appellate Division opined that "municipal authorities have an obligation to obtain the missing information if that can be done with a modicum of effort," citing Goodwin v New York City Hous. [read post]
26 May 2019, 5:23 pm by Public Employment Law Press
"To the extent that Plaintiff did not establish actual notice because she did not specify that her description of the assault included a recitation of who was in the room, the Appellate Division opined that "municipal authorities have an obligation to obtain the missing information if that can be done with a modicum of effort," citing Goodwin v New York City Hous. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
In Goodwin v United Kingdom (2002)  the Strasbourg Court held that this inability of the English law to recognise and give effect to a change of gender through gender re-assignment surgery was a violation of a person’s Article 8 rights. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 2:00 am by mes286
Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Dobbs v. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:33 pm by Zosha Millman
– Fox Rothschild’s Jody Simon writing out of Los Angeles on their Pay or Play Blog March Monitoring Madness and Monitoring Methods – Minneapolis lawyer V. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
UPS – Hartford attorney Daniel Schwartz of Shipman & Goodwin in his Connecticut Employment Law Blog Employee Apps = Employer Data Risk? [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 11:20 am by Cathy Reno
The controversial Citizens United v. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 12:23 am
Goodwin Subscription Required KINGS COUNTYReal Property Deed Seems to Be Intended as Security; Motion to Supplement Claim Is Granted Southwell v. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 9:31 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 25219, Feb. 17, 2011) and dismissed a Jewish inmate's complaint that he was denied kosher food for 30 days after having been observed eating a non-kosher meal when delivery of his kosher meal was delayed.In Goodwin v. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 4:49 am by SHG
The scenario is the sort that would make for a great law school argument about the merit of a doctrine taken to its logical extreme, except that the logical extreme actually played out before the 9th Circuit in US v. [read post]