Search for: "Grand v. Hope"
Results 401 - 420
of 862
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2015, 2:25 pm
The case, Ruusunen v. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 8:41 am
Windsor v. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 12:30 pm
First, and doctrinally, there’s the “immediate custodian” rule articulated by the Supreme Court in Rumsfeld v. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 6:26 am
Google (Case No. 11/07970, Tribunal de Grand Instance de Paris, decision of November 6, 2013). [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 1:26 am
If this line of reasoning was endorsed by the Grand Chamber, the case law of the CJEU regarding arbitration would change significantly. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 11:25 am
The case of Entick v. [read post]
28 Dec 2014, 2:37 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2014, 7:27 pm
As you read each, consider the vast conceptual space that separates these statements--not just in terms of hope and fear, but also in terms of the geo-political considerations that underlie the rationales offered in each, as well as they expectations proffered by each leader as justification for such radical departures from political behaviors that had, until recently, served each state well enough. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 2:21 pm
Indeed, the law of every US jurisdiction leaves this to the prosecutor’s unfettered discretion; and both the prosecutor and the defense lawyer know that the grand jury, which typically will hear from one side only, is highly likely to approve any charge the prosecutor recommends. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 7:33 am
v=igQDvYOt_iA [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 4:00 am
In LICRA v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 4:00 am
In a recent case called Colley v. [read post]
30 Nov 2014, 3:37 pm
Miller v. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 9:47 am
State v. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 12:00 pm
The question in United States v. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 11:08 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 6:08 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 6:08 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 6:08 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 5:09 am
” At Comparative Patent Remedies, Thomas Cotter discusses the invitation brief filed by the Solicitor General recently in Kimble v. [read post]
